“He’s trying to paint himself as some kind of choir boy,” said Brookes, a Republican and former pharmaceutical executive who recalled an encounter with a drunken Kavanaugh at a fraternity event. “You can’t lie your way onto the Supreme Court, and with that statement out, he’s gone too far. It’s about the integrity of that institution.”
wow you really nailed it this time mojo. That first sentence pretty much says it all. Kavannaugh said he never drank enough to pass out. The witness says Kavanaugh drank enough to stumble. Wow, end of debate right there, that beyond a doubt makes him a sexual predator at events n o one can verify the location, what happened or who was there....Yes sir guilty as charged.
,,,seriously...
....who is the one being raped here ???
...it is surely not the so-called accuser(s) !
it is all about moral fortitude...
and there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever of the likewise...
CNN goes for the kill!
https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/26/politics/julie-swetnick-allegation-kavanaugh/index.html
"She said she told at least two other people about the "gang rape" attack on her shortly after the incident, but she has not identified those people."
And guess who this ladies attorney is?
https://www.dailywire.com/news/30149/cnn-interviewed-stormy-daniels-lawyer-59-times-paul-bois
Wow, what a freakish coincidence!
Getting more interesting all the time:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/36375/kavanaugh-accuser-sued-former-employer-used-law-ryan-saavedra
"Roughly a decade ago, Ms. Swetnick was involved in a dispute with her former employer, New York Life Insurance Co., over a sexual-harassment complaint she filed, according to people familiar with the matter," The Wall Street Journal reported late Tuesday."
"Representing her in the complaint was the firm run by Debra Katz, the lawyer currently representing Dr. Ford."
Wow, another incredibly freakish coincidence.
What's really hilarious here is that the left apparently feels that drinking at frat party while in college raises serious questions about your qualifications for the supreme court, while the adulthood antics of assorted Kennedies and Ellison, et. al. are personal matters.
But then, it's really not a rational process.