Previous threads about Hunter and Biden family corruption/crimes:
It's not a matter of whether they will find criminal activity but instead, how bad will it be and how effective the Biden spinmasters are at damage control.
It likely that most of the republicans will believe all the bad stuff, and very few of the democrats will believe any of it.
Democrats insist this is political.
Of course it is!
Democrats don't want to investigate crimes committed by the Biden's because they're democrats.
I DON'T OFTEN DISAGREE WITH ALAN, BUT... I DO ON THIS! LOL
Thanks much Jean!
I also like him too but agree with him strongly.
1. Nothing will come of this.
2. There must have been a whistle blower out to get Biden that tipped the justice department off.
3. This makes it impossible to prosecute Trump.
4. Megan speculated that Biden could have been the one to report this to get Trump off the hook so that Trump will be the one he runs against. Pretty crazy theory because both Trump and Biden are unlikely to be running.
Biden is one of the worst presidents in history with disasterous policies on energy, the southern border, inflation, foreign policy(Afghanistan/Ukraine). What would he run on? He struggles with basic communication at times and looks/acts like a man at least 10 years older than his age.
If Trump got the nomination, then republicans deserve to lose for voting for the president that has done more damage to his party in history. More damage to the integrity of the office of president. More to increase political divisiveness and hatred. The president with a legacy of violating our Constitution and his oath, trying to overturn the most secure election in history with corruption and inspired people to commit an insurrection.
Almost every republican can beat Biden........except for Trump. Almost every democrat would do better than Biden(not Harris, partly because she's associated with Biden's awful record).
For the next several months we will waste a ton of time on this classified documents stuff and both sides will occasionally spout political nonsense to back their person and vilify the person from the other party, like this guy below.
Tonight, Hannity was trying to convince viewers that Hunter was in the same house where the classified documents were and had access to them and could have used them for his self serving purposes.
That's completely retarded and propaganda stating things that his viewers want to believe.
We can't really give Hunter much credit for being clever since he left his laptop at a computer store and forgot about it being there with massive evidence to incriminate him and his family.
Hannity suggests that if somebody was to use classified documents like the ones Joe had, they would just put them back where they were when done with them?
Like, "hey Dad, can I borrow these classified documents for a couple of weeks to take with me on a trip to China, then I'll put them back in the locked garage, next to the Corvette when I'm done"
There's much that we will never know...........and it's situations like that which allows spinmasters like Hannity to wildly speculate nonsense with impunity about it, because he can never be proven wrong with facts that will never come out.
IMO~ IF THIS CRAPOLA DOESN'T GET STOPPED, IT'LL JUST GET WORSE!
MAKE AN EXAMPLE OUT OF BOTH TRUMP & BIDEN, LET 'EM SIT THEIR ARSES BEHIND BARS FOR AWHILE...AND, NOT IN SOME POSH "PRISON"
SAME GOES FOR EVERY PAST PRESIDENT & VP, ~ PLUS ANYONE ELSE INVOLVED IN THE COVER-UPS, THAT'S STILL ALIVE!
CHANGE THE LAW TO WHERE NO ONE IS ALLOWED TO TAKE DOCUMENTS "HOME".
Jean we have a law. There are lower level staff4rs sitting in jail right now for doing the same. Elites are never held to account. Or very seldom held to account.
MCFARM, THAT'S BEEN ONGOING FOR A VERY LONG TIME... EONS!!
IT'S GETTING WORSE, BY THE MINUTE. WE'RE GONNA WIND UP IN CIVIL WARII >>>>>> FOLKS LIKE ME THAT HAVE ZERO TOLERANCE FOR ANY FORM OF DISHONESTY, ARE GETTIN' CLOSE TO "BLOWIN' A GASKET"!
While there are real issues that could benefit from congressional oversight, Ian Sams, a spokesman for the White House Counsel's office, previously described the probe into Hunter Biden as "politically-motivated attacks chock full of long-debunked conspiracy theories."
More like chock full of covered up corruption by the Biden crime family:
Couldn't happen to a more deserving dirt bag:
I'M WONDERING WHAT IS MUCH BIGGER THAN THIS, THAT THEY'RE TRYING TO KEEP QUIET!! YA KNOW... DISTRACT, DISTRACT, DISTRACT!!
“For over a decade, the Biden family has profited from Joe Biden’s positions as a public official,” Comer wrote. “Your arrangement with Hunter Biden raises serious ethics concerns and calls into question whether the Biden family is again selling access and influence.”
Hunter Biden launched his art career after his father took office as president in 2021 — after previously seeking business, alongside his uncle James Biden, in countries where his dad held sway as vice president, including China and Ukraine.
“Despite being a novice artist, Hunter Biden received exorbitant amounts of money selling his artwork, the buyers’ identities remain unknown, and you appear to be the sole record keeper of these lucrative transactions,” Comer wrote to Berges."
" Republicans have dismissed Democrats’ attempts to try to blunt their investigations.
“I have never seen anything like it,” Comer told CNN when asked about the Democratic efforts. “I have never seen an administration work so closely with outside groups to attack the investigators.”
Democrats know what's out there and its really, REALLY bad for the Bidens. They can't defend it, except to use disengenous words that claim the republicans are doing it for political reasons (dugh, did we expect the democrats to hold Biden accountable??? This is an authentic use of political power).
And to conjure up bogus attacks on the ones doing a legit politically motivated investigation (which would be an extremely fraudulent use of a political attack by he democrats).
Think about it.
They would not be doing these attacks on the republicans doing the investigation.........except for one thing.
To try to deflect and discredit the information that the investigators find. This summarizes it:
1. They know there's some really bad doo doo coming down.
2. They know that there's not going to be any effective way to offset that with a defense of the indefensible.
3. They are actually PLANNING ahead on the best way to do damage control.
4. Instead of addressing the Biden fraud and corruption(which they know is a losing cause because HE DID IT!.......they will just attack the investigators to try to smear and discredit them.
Hey, it worked well in the OJ trial and he got away with murder and many thousands of times elsewhere.
Time to circle the wagons to protect Joe Biden or........will they make it worse by denying the undeniable?
How will the media react?
They could end of throwing Biden to the wolves to salvage credibility in the face of anybody that isn't a diehard D that will never believe anything they aren't told to believe by their sources.
Exactly as they planned to do damage control.
They are attacking the ones that are going to uncover the crimes and trying to manufacture a false narrative that Hunter is a victim and being attacked and smeared by republicans and far right sources for political reasons.
Again, it IS political.
It's republicans holding a democratic family accountable for their many crimes based on legit facts.
No witchhunts here, folks! The authentic evidence is enormous.
"“This failed dirty political trick directly resulted in the exposure, exploitation, and manipulation of Mr. Biden’s private and personal information. Mr. Mac Isaac’s intentional, reckless, and unlawful conduct allowed for hundreds of gigabytes of Mr. Biden’s personal data, without any discretion, to be circulated around the Internet,” Hunter Biden’s attorney Abbe Lowell wrote in the letter."
I'D LIKE TO KNOW WHO IS THE ONE AUTHORISED TO PRESS CHARGES!! JUST LIKE HILLARY ~ NO ONE WILL!!!
You can tell when somebody being accused of crimes is guilty from 2 main things.
1. The strength of the evidence.
2. The response of the accused(their explanation for why they are innocent). If they're innocent, there's only 1 response/story from the get go and it doesn't change......the truth. If their story or tactics keep changing..........it means the truth from the get go would hurt them and they're just telling lies to cover up the truth. Once busted lying from the get go, their credibility is mud thereafter.
1. In this case, the facts look extremely bad for the Bidens. There's alot of them and they suggest serious crimes, well beyond blatant nepotism.
2. This was their first blatant attempt to cover up the Biden's with a huge, intentional lie.
Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say
That lie has been completely exposed as well as plenty of other ones. The extreme nature of that lie, with so many experts that know 10 times more than you and me about whether intelligence is legit or not and knew absolutely that it was not Russian intelligence...........is an indication of how bad this stuff really is.
After that, we've seen various versions of denial tactics and now, with some powerful evidence about to hit the fan, the tactic has morphed into an attack on the ones showing the evidence to try to trick/convince people into not believing anything and that Hunter and Joe are the actual victims not the perpetrators of the crimes when the evidence comes out.
It's quite elementary, using this strategy from his new team of advisors. They just need to convince people that Hunter and Joe are the victims and that their rights are being violated. Everybody that believes that will NOT believe a word of the evidence. No matter how powerful or convincing the evidence is......if they think Joe and Hunter are the victims in these investigations, they will interpret the evidence as a continued violation of Joe and Hunter's rights.
This comes right out of brainwashing 101 as well as used by thousands of lawyers to get criminals off......including one of the most famous cases, OJ Simpson killing 2 people.
Mark Ferdman, the lead investigator said some racist things in his life that they proved. I believe that Mark Ferdman probably was a racist. They convinced several in the jury that Ferdman, the racist was out to get OJ. ....so those people completely ignored the overwhelming evidence that OJ killed 2 people, entirely because they saw OJ, the black man as a victim of racist cops who framed him. Their minds were unable to objectively see the powerful evidence because of the effective brainwash that DEFINED everything as being from racist, incompetent cops trying to get OJ.
With the Biden defense, it's different people, completely different dynamic/situation but exact same brainwashing technique to turn the criminal into the victim in the eyes of the observers of the facts/evidence.
Millions will define all the evidence as being rooted in Republicans violating the Bidens rights because of pure politics and see the Bidens as the victims....no matter how compelling the evidence.
And it will work. It always does on the millions of people that WANT to believe it.
DIDN'T FERMAN TAMPER WITH EVIDENCE IN THAT OJ SAGA?
I STILL DON'T LIKE HIM!
He lost the case for them, Jean!
I KNOW, BUT..... I DON'T RECALL THE DETAILS.
I SAY HE GOT PAID OFF.
House Republicans failed in the opening salvo of their investigation into the finances of Joe Biden’s family to produce evidence substantiating their claims that US intelligence officials worked with Twitter Inc. to suppress an unflattering 2020 news story on the president’s son.
Former Twitter Inc. officials testified Wednesday that their decision to limit the spread of the New York Post story about Hunter Biden’s now-infamous laptop and his overseas business dealings was, in hindsight, a mistake. But they said they weren’t directed by the FBI or other US intelligence officials, and the action wasn’t politically motivated.
they said they weren’t directed by the FBI or other US intelligence officials, and the action wasn’t politically motivated.
So somebody tells what is a 10 on a scale of 1-10 for lies and this news source above, uses it for the basis of the title of the story: "House Republicans’ Hunter Biden Probe Begins With a Thud"
Why don't they at least do a basic fact check, man!
The "Twitter files" have shown at least some of the various internal conversations surrounding the Hunter Biden exposé, as senior Twitter employees engaged regularly with FBI and security chiefs.
Former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey criticized the decisions Twitter took after the story broke, tweeting "communications around our actions on the @nypost article was not great. And blocking URL sharing via tweet or DM with zero context as to why we're blocking: unacceptable."
More than 50 former intelligence officials signed a letter casting doubt on the provenance of a New York Post story on the former vice president's son.
January 16, 2023