Democrats don't want you to know this!
5 responses | 0 likes
Started by metmike - Aug. 27, 2024, 6:26 a.m.

Jill Stein Celebrates 'Big Win' Against Democrats After Lawsuit Dismissed

https://www.newsweek.com/jill-stein-democrats-wisconsin-lawsuit-ballot-kamala-harris-2024-election-1944711


jill stein 2024 logoBack to JillStein2024.com

Jill Stein for President
Ballot Access Map


https://www.jillstein2024ballotaccess.com/



metmike: Almost every vote that goes to the Green Party would have gone to Harris/Walz. The votes that Jill Stein took away from Hillary Clinton in 2016, may have cost her the election.

If the election is just as close this November, Jill Stein may play the role of stealer again. Ds have been trying to keep her/the Green Party off the ballot. We NEVER READ ABOUT THE GREEN PARTY from the MSM, D party mouth pieces/cheerleaders because they want to hide additional choices outside of  the 2 party options since it would HURT their objective of getting Harris elected.

Readers here know my position on authentic science and the fake climate crisis, so voting for the Green Party, which is fighting against the thing that is greening up the planet with beneficial CO2 gas emissions and has, almost by itself, lifted much of the world out of poverty(but warmed the planet-with some negatives that are outweighed X 10 by benefits to life) for me politically/scientifically, would be like driving my car at high speed into a brick wall   


Comments
By metmike - Aug. 27, 2024, 7:52 a.m.
Like Reply

Jill Stein cost Hillary dearly in 2016. Democrats are still writing off her successor.

The Green Party is set to nominate Howie Hawkins, a Democratic socialist making an explicit play for disaffected Bernie voters.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/20/democrats-shrug-off-potential-green-party-spoiler-in-2020-329170

Jill Stein still haunts Hillary Clinton’s campaign team.

“Oh woof. I can’t bear to talk about that,” said former communications director Jennifer Palmieri. 

For good reason: Had voters in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin cast their ballots for Clinton rather than the Green Party’s Stein, Clinton would be president.


By metmike - Aug. 27, 2024, 7:59 a.m.
Like Reply

The Greens in 2020 elections and beyond

https://www.gp.org/greens_in_2020_elections_and_beyond

Solidarity
By Howie Hawkins
January 15, 2021

The 2020 Green vote is not as low as David Cobb in 2004 (119,859 votes, 0.1%) or Cynthia McKinney in 2008 (161,797 votes, 0.1%). On the other hand, it is a step down from 2016, when Jill Stein received 1,457,216 votes, or 1.1%, under the very different dynamic of an open seat against the two most unpopular major party candidates in polling history.

In 2000, Ralph Nader ran for an open seat against Al Gore, representing the corporate Clinton legacy, and George W. Bush, billing himself as a “compassionate conservative.” Even with his nearly universal name recognition as an accomplished progressive reformer, Nader’s best-ever Green result in 2000 was still only 2,882,955 votes, or 2.7%, from 44 state ballots.

The most difficult campaigns for the Greens have been running with an incumbent right-wing Republican in office, Bush in 2004 and Trump in 2020. Despite the unfavorable dynamic, the 2020 Green vote is in the middle range, hopefully reflecting modest growth in the committed independent left vote over the last decade. The 2020 vote is comparable to the vote that Jill Stein received in 2012 (469,627 votes, 0.4%) running against Barack Obama, who had disappointed many progressives, and Mitt Romney, who presented himself as a moderate country-club Republican. Stein 2012 was on 37 ballots, compared to 30 ballots in 2020. The Green percent of the vote in states where its ticket was on the ballot in both 2016 and 2020 was higher in most states in 2020. This year’s results are also comparable in percentage to the vote (233,052 votes, 0.3%, from 30 ballots) for the 1980 campaign of environmental scientist Barry Commoner for the Citizens Party, which European Greens at the time considered America’s Green Party.

400,000 votes for an independent ecosocialist ticket is a base that can be built upon. However, a Green presidential ticket is unlikely to draw more than a small percentage of the vote until the Greens have become a major political force by electing thousands to municipal office and, on that foundation, to state legislatures and the House. The Greens have won over 1,200 elections over the years and currently have over 100 elected Greens in office. The Greens have proven they can win local races where the party’s community presence and canvassing count more than the money and media of major party candidates. When the Greens have built up their political strength from the bottom up and have a caucus in the House, a Green presidential ticket will draw more support.

By metmike - Aug. 27, 2024, 2:06 p.m.
Like Reply

Let me add, that this is such a sad commentary on the choices being given to Americans in voting for president. Especially from the point of view of this atmospheric scientist and PRACTICING environmentalist.

The 2 main parties have provided us with  2 people that SHOULD NEVER BE PRESIDENT......EVER!!!

Then we had another choice for awhile.........JFK, an anti vaccine nut case. 

But we can always vote for the worst choice yet, the Green Party Candidate. The ,fake climate crisis, anti energy candidate with policies that promote political/government agendas, crony capitalism,  broken science and misinformed but sincere fellow environmentalists.

What's ironic here is  that the dishonest, ratings seeking,  activist media that sensationalizes and cherry picks weather/climate and manufactures a false reality of us destroying the greening up planet because of a beneficial gas that's only 50% of the optimal level for most life...........is completely silent on THE GREEN PARTY CANDIDATE that matches closest with their coverage of the Fake Climate Crisis!!!

++++++++++++++

That because they want Harris to be elected!

By metmike - Sept. 2, 2024, 4:36 p.m.
Like Reply

Jill Stein, Chase Oliver Could Cost Kamala Harris in Pennsylvania: Poll

https://www.newsweek.com/kamala-harris-polling-third-party-pennslyvania-1947589

+++++++++++++++++

Shhhhh! Don't tell too many people about this MSM! You might hurt Harris's chances   

By mcfarm - Sept. 3, 2024, 6:46 a.m.
Like Reply

also another piece of dems at their best. RFK supposedly want his name off the ballots to make sure his votes not hurt Trump. Guess what. They are refusing that and his name stays on whether he is running or not..;what the hell makes sense for  dem