Neil deGrasse Tyson issues warning over 'city killer' asteroid as odds to hit Earth slashed by NASA
++++++++++++++
In a recent update shared by NASA the asteroid now has a 1.5% chance of hitting Earth in December 2032, based on new observations since the full moon has passed, CNN reported.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
metmike: "Don't worry about a real object that's 500 times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb moving in our direction" ??? Instead, this same guy wants us to spend our time worrying about a fake climate crisis based on a busted speculative theory.
++++++++++++++
By metmike - Aug. 12, 2024, 4:13 p.m.
By metmike - March 20, 2023, 11:36 p.m.
With today's latest IPCC report, we can now update the IPCC's predictions. See the last year below.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This was what they stated 35 years ago:
United Nations Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked
Associated Press – Jun 29, 1989
"A senior UN environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000"
"Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ''eco- refugees,’ ' threatening political chaos, said Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program, or UNEP."
FULL TEXT:
https://www.apnews.com/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Same busted forecast from them, year after year after year:
United Nations/IPCC- 1989-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC-1990-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 1991-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC-1992-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC-1993-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC-1994-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC-1995-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC-1996-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC-1997-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC-1998-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC-1999-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 2000-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 2001-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC-2002-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC-2003-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 2004-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 2005-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 2006-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 2007-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 2008-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 2009-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 2010-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 2011-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 2012-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 2013-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 2014-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations /IPCC-2015-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 2016-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 2017-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 2018-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC- 2019-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC-2020-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC-2021-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
United Nations/IPCC-2022-The world is doomed without a climate deal with widespread, global crop failures.
NEW: United Nations/IPCC-2023/24-The world is doomed without a climate deal.
Planet Earth 2023/24- A Scientific Climate Optimum for most life-Booming Biosphere-Global Greening-Polar Bears +25%
Deaths from Extreme Weather Down 95%
Record smashing crop yields........again!
Not in spite of climate change but BECAUSE OF IT!
No Climate Crisis, just a climate optimum!
++++++++++++++++++++++
Death by Greening:
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/69258/
Energy transition is a hoax
45 responses |
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/94557/
Big Oil SAVES Lives!
Started by metmike - April 11, 2024, 3:15 p.m. https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/103098/
Typical doomsday discussion from really smart scientists like Neil with no mention of the massive benefits that greatly outweigh negatives.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHJKKsOHtAk
+++++++
I love this guy but as an OBSERVATIONAL meteorologist and atmospheric scientist, I don't put all my eggs in speculative, catastrophic warming theory baskets that focus on only worst case scenarios of the worselements and completely ignore even more important physics, science, biology and climate.
Like the fact that most creatures on this planet would prefer it to still be a bit warmer and almost all plants would love the CO2 to double in order to reach the OPTIMAL LEVEL FOR LIFE.
We are supposedly killing the planet because of a beneficial gas that is only 50% the optimal level for most life on this planet.
And we refer to CO2 as carbon pollution, which is an anti science verbiage term, used even by smart, closed minded and dishonest scientists
By metmike - June 23, 2024, 12:44 p.m.
Rain and H2O (gas and liquid) are needed for life on this planet to exist.
So is CO2, another beneficial gas....... which is NOT carbon pollution as its NOT even carbon.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Re: Re: Re: National Climate Emergency??????????!!!!!!!!!!!
By metmike - June 22, 2024, 10:26 a.m.
This source displays a blatant bias when it comes to climate change.
Wanna know how to tell?
Anybody that uses the term "carbon pollution" for carbon dioxide is either not a scientist or is a blatantly biased scientist playing politics.
Using that term, carbon pollution is scientifically, exactly like using the term hydrogen pollution to describe water vapor/H2O in the air.
We know that a water molecule is formed from 2 atoms of hydrogen and 1 atom of oxygen. Water/H2O is neither hydrogen or oxygen. It's a totally different compound/molecule, using atoms held together by covalent bonds. It's essential for all life on this planet.
 | |||
| |||
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Exactly the same with CO2/carbon dioxide. It's formed from 2 atoms of oxygen and 1 atom of carbon. It is NOT oxygen and it certainly is not the solid, carbon. It's a totally different compound/molecule, with 1 C atom, covalently bonded with 2 O atoms. It's an essential GAS! At 426 parts per million, CO2 is less than 50% of the optimal level for most life(assuming that most animals eat plants or something that ate plants).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide
 | |||
| |||
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Carbon is a SOLID! Thousands of compounds have carbon atoms in them but they are NOT CARBON.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon
| Carbon | |
|---|---|
 Graphite (left) and diamond (right), two allotropes of carbon | |
| Allotropes | graphite, diamond and more (see Allotropes of carbon) |
| Appearance |
|
+++++++++++++++
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_compounds_with_carbon_number_1
+++++++++++++++++++++++
We know exactly why people use the ANTI science term, carbon pollution for CO2.
When you hear a source using that term or read it, you can be certain that they are either scientifically ignorant on this topic or intentionally using it to try to trick people into believing that the beneficial gas, CO2 is actually a pollutant and is bad, like black carbon or solid carbon particulate matter in the air.
++++++++++++++
Related to this:
By metmike - Feb. 23, 2025, 9:54 p.m.
