https://www.youtube.com/shorts/eIRNODAl4GA Sorry but here is another tape of Jan 6th testimony. After the previous tapes of testimony that puts the burden right where it belongs {on Pelosi's lying shoulders} here is another. From a guy who was also right there in the middle of it just like the director of the capitol testified {Sund} Beginning to sound a lot like all the covid crap that is now finally being debunked only false history of both have been so sorted by the libs in congress and the press few will care or notice.
Guess we can now add the many years of dailey lies about Biden and what he was and was not doing while they covered for him while he was supposed to be President. Hell we even got some in the media now selling CYA books to make more millions with more lies.
Thanks, mcfarm!
I busted these conspiracy theories and lies many hundreds of times, specifically the bogus "Nancy Pelosi called off the National Guard" hogwash dozens of times.
It's only been 2 weeks since you last posted complete hogwash on this topic, mcfarm because you keep going to sites/sources that lie to you about the authentic facts related to Trump's attempt to overthrow the most secure election in history, by a wide margin (based on it being scrutinized the most and it passing every single test with flying colors that were claiming widespread fraud THAT NEVER HAPPENED).
Isolated fraud that always happens during every election, yes.
And the silly notion that Nancy Pelosi was responsible for the Insurrection and not Donald Trump who was entirely responsible is at the top of the list.
Incredibly, more than 4 years later this nonsense lives on and on and on and on!
Here was your last thread:
2020 election again
Started by mcfarm - June 18, 2025, 5:51 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/112667/
Started by mcfarm - June 17, 2023, 4:52 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/96365/
+++++++++++++++
You will never believe 1 iota of this even if I provided 1 million times more evidence because you don't care about that evidence............which I'm repeating again for you.
There are plenty of readers that have NOT been brainwashed by Fox and other REAL enemies of the people that might process the information with comprehension.
You have decided to believe stuff like this, no matter what and only go to sources that tell you what you want to believe and your fork tongue sources are stealing your intelligence for their self enriching benefits.
Feel free to have your latest DISinformation and lies busted on a regular basis if you want people to see you this way.
On the left: Donald Trump Jr’s post after Nancy Pelosi’s husband, Paul, was the victim of an assassination attempt.
On the right: Nancy Pelosi’s post after Donald Trump was the victim of an assassination attempt.
Character and decency matter.
10:21 PM · Jul 13, 2024
·
1.2M
Views
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack
++++++++++++
No imaginary Ray Epps government conspiracy theory to frame President Trump. No Nancy Pelosi blocking Trump from calling in the National Guard nonsense.
Just a Donald Trump inspired riot at the end point of his 2 months of imposing diabolical schemes, abusing his power as president, violating his commitment to serve Americans and the Constitution in order to try to overturn the extremely proven secure results of the 2020 election that HE LOST by every single reasonable standard/test.
+++++++++++++
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack
Main article: Law enforcement response to the January 6 United States Capitol attack § Preparations for January 6'
Social media users said a video shows Pelosi “takes responsibility for not having the National Guard” at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
In the video, Pelosi said, “I take responsibility for not having them just prepare for more,” when talking about U.S. Capitol security. As then-House speaker, Pelosi did not have the authority to deploy the National Guard. The president, defense secretary and U.S. Army secretary are the only people authorized to deploy the District of Columbia National Guard.
Records show that Pelosi approved a request to contact the Pentagon for help getting National Guard troops to the Capitol as rioters laid siege.
+++++++++++++
Re: Re: Presidential debate 6-27-24
By metmike - July 1, 2024, 10:19 a.m.
Thanks, Larry!
I busted the "Nancy Pelosi stopped Trump from having the National Guard protecting the Capital" COMPLETE NONSENSE numerous times here.
US National Guard on Jan 6th
Started by mcfarm - April 23, 2024, 6:21 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/103446/
Hidden Jan. 6 Transcript Revealed, Undermining House Committee’s Claim 18 responses |
Started by cutworm - March 11, 2024, 2:47 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/102613/
Trump calls Jan. 6 riot ‘a beautiful day’ during CNN town hall
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7Bg5_-7e00
By Associated Press
June 27, 2024
Former President Donald Trump falsely claimed that then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi “turned down” his offer to send “10,000 soldiers or National Guard” to the Capitol during the Jan. 6 insurrection.
Pelosi does not direct the National Guard. Further, as the Capitol came under attack, she and then-Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell called for military assistance, including from the National Guard.
The Capitol Police Board decides on whether to call National Guard troops to the Capitol. It is made up of the House Sergeant at Arms, the Senate Sergeant at Arms and the Architect of the Capitol. The board decided not to call the guard ahead of the insurrection but did eventually request assistance after the rioting had already begun, and the troops arrived several hours later.
There is no evidence that either Pelosi or McConnell directed the security officials not to call the guard beforehand.
++++++++++++++++++++++=
TRUMP KNOWS THIS and is blatantly lying or else is so delusional that he can't remember and is replacing stone cold facts about how things happened with imaginary, wishful thinking facts in his mind.
Steven Sund Capitol police, Jan 6 was preventable
Started by cutworm - Sept. 20, 2023, 11:39 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/99142/
++++++++++++
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Steven Sund Capitol police, Jan 6 was preventable
By metmike - Sept. 21, 2023, 4:28 p.m.
I liked O'reilly more than anyone at Fox.
I fact checked this one on the National Guard several times already but here we go again. He's wrong.
To be honest, from the get go it sounded like nonsense but I assumed it MIGHT or COULD be right and tried to verify it but came up empty every time.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-235651652542
Did Pelosi order National Guard troops to leave the Capitol?
https://www.cnn.com/factsfirst/politics/factcheck_6572efad-c0c8-461b-9f26-1020801703db
https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-trump-order-national-guard-156055113284
A claim from Donald Trump Jr. is false.
By metmike - Jan. 5, 2023, 3:26 p.m.
Nancy's roll in that mess?
That's a completely made up conspiracy theory from Fox news, mcfarm!
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/90750/
stated on June 9, 2022 in a TV segment:
“Donald Trump authorized up to 20,000 National Guard troops to protect the Capitol" before Jan. 6, 2021, but was "rejected" by Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer.
I believe with 99.99% confidence that mcfarm will not believe 1 iota of that stuff.
No big deal. I just scanned thru a bunch of previous posts and threads that mcfarm read and ignored without doing that much work because mcfarm wants to demonstrate to us how somebody can be so brainwashed that NOTHING can change their mind, no matter how indisputable it is and how many times its proven beyond any shred of doubt if they don't want to believe it.
mcfarm,
I appreciate you teaching us this lesson! How NOT to learn new things because we prefer to believe in bogus things that line up with what we want to be true!
Conspiracy theories
Started by metmike - Oct. 10, 2024, 8:26 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/107956/
Cognitive Bias/Conspiracy Theories
Started by metmike - Nov. 6, 2021, 1:19 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/77243/
Major DISinformation source
Started by metmike - Oct. 2, 2023, 8:05 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/99368/
Captured Brains
Started by joj - Aug. 18, 2023, 8:30 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/98352/
Cognitivebiases
Started by metmike - April 24, 2022, 11:34 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/83621/
Captured brains
Started by metmike - April 10, 2021, 12:32 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/67714/
your entire argument falls upon the use of the word "activate". There has never been a reliable source that said the liar and chief Pelosi could "activate" the guard. the entire scenario is the easily documented testimony of Sund who are you going to believe. Sund's testimony compared to Pelosis's is no contest. The guard was activated but the Pelosi had to request the aid that an easily more reliable source {Sund} requested. No contest for anyone anywhere who has followed Pelosi's life of corruption. There has never {that I have ever seen} been any hint of Sund being anything but a witness under oath relaying facts. And it is odd you are anyone else has never tried to attack Sund's testimony......I think there is a good reason for that. He told the truth.
In fact I have been reading a lot about the aftermath of Custer's last stand lately and what they found on that battle field. Your argument sounds like I would be silly if I did not agree with the 3rd cousin, second great grandchild and drunk nephew or step child 100 years after the fight on their ideas of what the battle field looked like instead of eyewitness testimony given under oath.
Furthermore that statement by Pelosi about the near killing of a President on live TV is just too damn rich. A statement so filled with that kind of false concern belongs only on cnn or msnbc. You think Hillary is evil. Let me tell you Pelosi is a close second.
mc,
It’s amazing to me that you are blaming Pelosi for this. But due to you almost never having a genuinely bad thing to say about someone with an R by their name other than perhaps when an R goes against Trump, I’m not at all surprised. I have nothing else to say as I’m at a loss for any other words. Why waste my time when Mike has responded to you so often with detailed replies showing you to be wrong?
Larry. why would it be a waste of time to defend a good man and his character. Sund did not ask for this. He did his job and was honest about it. Many pols including D's and R's alike cannot come close to the man Sund is
Thanks mcfarm and Larry,
mcfarm, you selectively pick your sources based on whether they tell you what you want to believe or not.
The sources here come from BOTH sides and ideally ALL sides.
For instance, on this topic you've given us 1 side(your side). I've provided the other side.
On other topics, your side is the same one as mine but only because I switched sides to line up with the authentic facts and truth. However, as Larry suggested, your side will always be the same one 100% of the time and your sources are using you because of this. Trump is the master at exploiting MAGA people with mind control using this same brainwashing type technique.
Everything that I stated above is like a foreign language to your brain because you only go to sources that speak to you in MAGA-ese.
People that believe the lies on Fox, for instance(which is most of them or they wouldn't go there) can't comprehend things that contradict what has been defined for their minds as "the truth".
The authentic truth is a foreign language because the manufactured reality is the one they were taught to believe.
If i had a young child and taught them that 2+2 =10 and that the name of a dog is cat and that the name of a cat is dog. They would struggle to understand the truth in the REAL WORLD, where 2+2 =4 and dogs are dogs, cats are cats.
The evidence provided above is from the REAL WORLD. What your sources tell you are the manufactured reality.
And even after I explain it like this, your mind still won't think "wow, metmike I didn't realize I'm just believing manufactured realities about the 2020 election and Insurrection"
You sincerely believe what you believe and I understand it and blame your sources that know what they are doing when they make stuff up for their self enriching or political agenda.
I have one source. Sund. Trump was never mentioned, not once except by those with captured TDS brains, why else even bring him up in a post that never once mentioned him. I believe Sund. Have you ever tried to destroy his testimony? Odd and telling. I choose to put Pelosi right where she belongs. An unbelievable liar, one of the biggest inside traders in history who rides on the back of the American tax payer. Yes I am talking million upon millions of dollars reaped with inside information only members of congress had. You got something on Sund lets hear it.
And yes, I am blaming Pelosi for her part in this fiasco and as importantly her part in the lies she has told over and over.
And if Pelosi's part is not bad enough now comes the FBI. Latest testimony now is that FBI sources were not only in the crowd doing who knows what but as many as 13 to 15 illegally entered the capitol and did who knows what. Incite? Insurrect? lead? follow? direct? Tell the damn fool of a unqualified guard to shoot an unarmed service member? Right we do not know do we? And old Chris Wray sitting there before congress the whole time acting like he didn't know a thing.
Thanks mcfarm,
I completely obliterated Sund‘s testimony for you and cutworm and copied the obliteration over a dozen times, including this last time for you guys to completely ignore each time.
With regards to the Ray Epps/FBI conspiracy theory bunk that you just brought up for the umpteenth time, you’ll find that also completely obliterated with the authentic facts contained in all the threads/postsfrom earlier.
This isn’t even about what REALLY happened.That was indisputably,proven beyond every shadow of a doubt Years ago with objective, authentic facts.
Its about why dishonest sources continue to blatantly lie about it with long ago busted, made up versions that blame people and sources that supposedly framed or unfairly blamed Donald Trump who, supposedly tried to prevent, then stop the riot.
Actually, he refused to call his,people off for 187 minutes after his contacts pleaded with him to tell his people to stop. rioting.
Instead, he watched the rioting and rooted for them, on his personal tv monitors, like you would watch an IU basketball game and completely ignored the pleas. For him to call them off.
It wasn’t until it had failed, over 3 hours later that he finally came out and told the rioters to go home and told them how much he appreciated them for rioting for him.
Thats what makes these fairy tale versions that MAGA wants to believe especially crazy.
It would be like telling farmers no rain for 3 months is a flood and 5 inches of rain overnight is a drought. We know what a real flood and drought are, just like we know exactly what happened on election night, 2020. What happened for 2 months after that, especially on January 6, 2021.
Thats been proven with all the authentic facts.
The main point here, for me is the one that relates to millions of, mostly MAGA followers believing versions of these events with the faith of a religion but worse because you can never prove that there is no God.
We've irrefutably proven the Pelosi and FBI/Ray Epps bunk is a complete lie more times than I can count.
God gave you free will to use to believe whatever you want and I give you a platform here to express that.
So it’s on you and your dishonest sources for choosing this part of a tunnel vision, political belief system and I’m just exposing it and speaking for the objective truths.
In looking more at recent documents, I realize there is another element going on. This president is altering official documents from the past about this and replacing them with HIS manufactured versions related to the 2020 election aftermath, including January 6, 2021.
Dishonest R sources, like Fox news are using this to try to continue the re-litigation of the already proven authentic facts.
You can see, from me just posting a tiny sample of the information here related to this topic that I spent many hundreds of hours of work gathering the objective facts. I have also stated many times that I voted for Trump.
2 times in fact(2016 and 2024).
Accusing me of being TDS would be especially absurd, considering I've gone to bat for President Trump with such gusto every time that he was done wrong:
Previous related threads that expose these farce trials:
Get Trump-Hush Money Hullabaloo
26 responses |
Started by metmike - April 17, 2024, 4:57 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/103255/
Trump civil fraud trial-nonsense
Started by metmike - Nov. 12, 2023, 2:43 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/100509/
+++++++++++++++++++++
Trump rape case
Started by metmike - May 3, 2023, 9:33 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/94926/
2-11-25: Agreed, mcfarm!!! Comey and his associates are VERY corrupt.
Re: Re: More election fraud nonsense
By metmike - June 3, 2024, 3 p.m.
Make NO mistake. Trump was not the first person and the Rs were not the first party to take this position of a FAKE election steal:
12 Minutes of Democrats Denying Election Results
https://gop.com/video/12-minutes-of-democrats-denying-election-results/
+++++++++++++
We know what Trump did after the 2020 election loss but completely lost in the discussion was what the Ds and justice department did after the 2016 election........insisting that Trump's presidency was illegitimate because of "Russian Interference!"
Special Counsel Durham Testifies
Started by metmike - June 21, 2023, 11:24 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/96516/
Durham's final report.........Muellers corrupt investigation
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/95210/
Sussman
9 responses |
Started by wglassfo - June 1, 2022, 11:21 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/85147/
would our little Hillary does this?
5 responses |
Started by mcfarm - May 20, 2022, 3:52 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/84655/
More Mueller corruption!
Started by metmike - Sept. 11, 2020, 6:44 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/59031/
FISA report: DOJ watchdog releases findings on Russia probe surveillance Started by metmike - Dec. 9, 2019, 1:12 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/44076/
IG testimony today
Started by wglassfo - Dec. 11, 2019, 5:09 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/44129/
Alan Dershowitz: Stone indictment follows concerning Mueller pattern
Re: Re: Pardon for Michael Flynn
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/61735/#61805
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/60589/#60599
Reviewing Muellers corruption with facts:
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/55925/#55961
Just to add this about Horowitz's covering up for the FBI with his interpretation of their unethical behavior(calling it just a bunch of double digit, unintentional errors):
March 31, 2020
new stone video
36 responses |
Started by mcfarm - Feb. 9, 2019, 11:20 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/23544/
++++++++++++++
2-11-25: And they covered for the Biden crime family for many years! Including 50+ of them making up a fairy tale about Hunter's laptop story coming from Russia, just before the 2020 election.
The smartest man that Joe Biden knows
18 responses |
Started by metmike - March 15, 2023, 6:37 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/93831/
+++++++++++++++
2-11-25: Many of us remember when Comey suddenly took over the corrupt Hillary Clinton investigation, after attorney general Lorreta Lynch got busted meeting with Bill Clinton at the Phoenix airport and resigned her role-then appointed corrupt puppet Comey(they made the arrangement with the justice department to have them drop all the legit charges for Hillary's many violations/crimes) because of a whistle blower.
McCabe Interview on 60 Minutes
Started by pj - Feb. 18, 2019, 2:21 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/24146/
With regards to Trump watching and rooting for HIS rioters on January 6th and NOT calling the National Guard to stop them:
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/04/17/trump-jan-6-capitol-riot-national-guard-00152757
04/17/2024 11:00 AM EDT
“Could the president have picked up the phone, called the secretary of defense, and said, you know, ‘What’s going on here?’ Our law enforcement is getting overrun, make this happen!’” a committee staffer asked Brooks, according to the transcript of a previously unreported March 14 interview reviewed by POLITICO.
“I assume he could expedite an approval through the Secretary of Defense, through the Secretary of the Army,” Brooks replied.
But Trump never called any military leaders on Jan. 6, per testimony from senior administration officials to the Jan. 6 select committee — a fact that the panel emphasized in its final report that concluded Trump was uniquely responsible for the violent Capitol attack by his supporters. Rather, he was observing the riot on TV and calling allies in his quest to subvert the 2020 election, as outlined by committee witnesses and White House records.
Brooks’ exchange with the committee staffer underscored the reality of Trump’s inaction: “And to your knowledge, did that happen on January 6th?” the staffer continued.
“No,” Brooks said.
Dean, similarly, noted that if Trump had placed a call to Pentagon leaders at 2 p.m. — around the time the Capitol was first breached — and said “go,” the guard would have reached the Capitol sooner than it did that day.
“I think if the Secretary of the Army, the Secretary of Defense, or the president had said ‘Go,’ … or a combination thereof had said ‘Go,’ then we would’ve gone and we would’ve been there much faster,” Dean told congressional investigators on March 26.
+++++++++++++++++++++
The most amazing thing about all of this is that Trump is the president again. After committing treason, betraying Americans and the Constitution and violating the duties that he swore to uphold, he should be in prison not the White House.
Again, I voted for him last November. That's how bad Biden/Harris were.