Fact Checking the Fact Checkers

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/06/06/fact-checking-the-fact-checkers/

This was my comment:

Wonderful job using facts to show the truth about the fake climate crisis.  

I think that using soybean instead of corn yields is a better crop to demonstrate the affects of CO2 because:

1. Soybeans use the C3 pathway, as do the majority of crops and C3 plants are affected more than C4 plants, like corn by the CO2 level.
2. Corn has benefited more from nitrogen fertilizer than soybeans.  
3. Regardless, all crops, including corn are greatly benefiting from the increase in CO2 and beneficial weather/climate.

https://www.nass.usda.gov/Charts_and_Maps/Field_Crops/soyyld.php

If you want actual scientific data from 290 studies on soybeans and many hundreds of other plants, with many thousands of studies........follow the links here:

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62784/#62787

Why people still question this powerful fertilization affect and the law of photosynthesis can only be explained by severe cognitive bias that causes them to ignore no brainer science.

Thousands of studies done on almost every plant we know of tell us clearly that the optimal amount of CO2 for most plants is around 900 ppm, which is more than double the current level.

The planet is greening up....REALLY greening up, including remote areas, which can't be caused by technological advances, like the use of fertilizers on crops. 

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/146296/global-green-up-slows-warming

Forests are growing much faster:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100201171641.htm

Even deserts are greening up some:

https://phys.org/news/2013-07-greening-co2.html

It's not like there are mixed signals or that CO2 and its relationship with  plants has 2 sides that offset each other. In fact, in addition to the fertilization benefit to plants, elevated CO2 levels allow plants to conserve water during droughts and be more heat tolerant during heat waves.

https://buythetruth.wordpress.com/2009/06/13/photosynthesis-and-co2-enrichment/

Young children in grade school can easily understand this basic science, though sadly, many are being taught that CO2 is pollution which is killing the planet and NOT the authentic science of the REAL world above.

If there was such a thing as greening the planet to death, then maybe we would have a real climate crisis from burning fossil fuels. 

Original article: Science under attack

https://www.scienceunderattack.com/blog/2021/2/22/latest-computer-climate-models-run-almost-as-hot-as-before-71?mc_cid=16187a9948&mc_eid=4961da7cb1

Latest Climate Models Still Running Far Too Hot

https://iowaclimate.org/2021/02/24/latest-climate-models-still-running-far-too-hot/

Despite misinformation from alarmist scientists to pretend this is not the case, it was the IPCC itself in AR5 which confirmed the woeful performance of models in 2013:

Some of this stuff is ridiculous..........and people believe it............all of it!!

                Fake beer crisis            

                            Started by metmike - May 11, 2021, 2:31 p.m.   

         https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/69258/

Why do all the people believe in it?

Because they only read and hear the manufactured crisis based on computer simulations of the future atmosphere using subjectively chosen mathematical equations that have been too warm for 3 decades but the biased scientists refuse to reconcile them with reality. 

The observations of the REAL planet?

Those get censored:

                Stossel is censored by Facebook for telling the truth about climate            

            https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/70707/

Ironically, fossil fuels are the only REAL green energy source that's really greening up the planet.........entirely using natures law of photosynthesis!!( in tandem with the best weather and climate in the last 1,000 years from climate change).

Solar and Wind are the most environmentally unfriendly energy sources in history.

Note something important they don't want you to know at the end of the first link below. We will be running out of most fossil fuels in less than 60 years(exception is coal) if we do absolutely nothing!

The truth is that this has been a hijacking of climate science (they even rewrote climate history to wipe out the Mideival Warm Period, this warm 1,000 years ago) to accomplish a political agenda(global socialism) using CO2.

They could have just told the truth. We will be running out of fossil fuels soon, so we need to develop these alternate energy sources to replace fossil fuels. 

But that would make us cherish fossil fuels even more for what they do for us and the greening planet. The truth wouldn't  have nearly the same impact/sense of urgency of "We only have 10 years to act before using fossil fuels destroys the planet"

In a rational, honest world using authentic science and empirical data that last statement would only be seen as satire.

In this world of manufactured realities........it's the one that's defining what people think that they know. 

                Green energy            

                            Started by wglassfo - June 9, 2021, 12:48 p.m.            

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/70725/

                Wind/ solar/batteries            

                            16 responses |               

                Started by metmike - May 6, 2021, 9:58 p.m.            

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/69028/