April 16, 2022
The Biden administration has, at long last, finally decided to follow the law — only just a bit. And it really doesn't want people to know about it either way, which is why the announcement was made on Good Friday afternoon.
After refusing to comply with a court order requiring him to sell leases for oil and gas exploration on federal land last year, Biden is finally succumbing to the pressure of high gas prices. That's the good news. The bad news is that he is selling a mere fraction of the leases the government would normally sell. This probably belongs in the category of "better than nothing."
The decision also comes with some entertainment value. Just a week after Democrats sat in a committee hearing excoriating oil executives for failing to produce enough, Interior Secretary Deb Haaland released an extremely arrogant statement that turned that entire line of argument into the joke it always was.
"For too long, the federal oil and gas leasing programs have prioritized the wants of extractive industries above local communities, the natural environment, the impact on our air and water, the needs of tribal nations, and, moreover, other uses of our shared public lands," her statement reads.
This is just so much claptrap to placate environmentalists, who will be extremely angry about this anyway.
Their real objection they will hold in reserve — that we should never use oil or natural gas. But since reasonable people don't accept that, they will make the argument that this oil and gas won't be available in time to help with the current crisis. This is, of course, a long-running fallacy they resort to. This oil and gas would already be worth a lot more if we had started looking for it last year, but Biden paused all new exploration on federal lands. The oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge would be flowing in abundance today but for their three-decade campaign of resistance. You have to start sometime.
Today, new sources and supplies of oil and gas are a prerequisite for getting Europe to commit to boycotting Russian supplies. Until Europe joins our boycott, it is not going to work. For now, all our boycott is doing is increasing the price at which Putin can sell his oil and gas to his regular customers. It may be the right thing, but it won't work unless our allies get involved as well, and that means providing them with alternatives.
The best way to counter those "Putin price hikes" at the gas pump has always been to produce the gas here at home. But the long-term beneficiaries of what we do now will be our trading partners. Many European countries listened to environmentalists for too long and made themselves too dependent upon Russian oil and gas. They are now realizing that this isn't going to work. They need to produce more of their own energy or find other non-Russia sources, lest they find themselves at the mercy of their neighborhood narcissistic bully in Moscow.
Just as Sweden and Finland are now moving to join NATO because they realize they could be on Russia's menu in 2030 or 2035, we need to be thinking ahead — at least to next winter and surely beyond that, when Russian threats to cut off the supply of natural gas could force further diplomatic concessions. Our fracking and a dramatic increase in the export of liquefied natural gas can be part of the solution, in tandem with a new European commitment to fracking and nuclear power.
Russia's most powerful weapon is not nuclear bombs, a weapon of last resort, but natural gas. We can fix that by exporting much more liquefied natural gas to European ports, weakening Russia and helping our allies at the same time.
Meanwhile, Biden's decision gives the lie to his own excuses and laughable defense of his own conduct up to now. What happened to that talking point about all those leases and permits that were already issued? I thought all these oil companies were somehow getting rich by not producing oil — at least, that's what a dozen Democratic House members claimed in their hearing last week. What happened to that argument?
The high gas prices and the war in Ukraine are putting Democrats into that proverbial circular room where they cannot find a corner to sit. Democrats support high gas prices — it's part of their environmental agenda. But voters hate high gas prices, so Democrats need a scapegoat. They tried Putin, but the timeline didn't work, so then they tried to blame oil companies. Now Biden has at least halfheartedly answered the oil companies' demands for more leases, which has made all those Democrats look like idiots.
metmike: Extended from this thread:
The fake Putin Price Hike
Started by metmike - April 15, 2022, 12:43 p.m.
metmike: These people actually get paid money to come up with such retarded solutions that have no chance of solving the problem.
Pushing fake green energy beyond what it's capable of delivering(that any objective person with a legit understanding of energy knew was going to happen) is getting us into more and more trouble.
So the response to the very busted solution? Double down on the broken solution and continue to sell it with even more gusto...........as the hole gets deeper and deeper.
Is a magic green fairy going to suddenly come to the rescue and command wind energy to do things that it can't do. Cause it to stop destroying the environment, stop raping the earth of natural resources, stop killing millions of birds to get diffuse, unreliable energy from huge turbines with a life span of 25 years........which, after that go into massive landfill graveyard waste sites?
No magic green fairies in the real world coming to save us from the huge green energy scams based on anti science, anti physics, anti environmental, anti energy, anti economic growth schemes.
Climate science was hijacked. Climate history was rewritten to scare us into going along with these schemes in order to "save the planet", which ironically is experiencing the BEST weather/climate for most life in the last 1,000 years".
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/83371/#83385
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
All because of something that's greening up the planet!
Fake beer crisis/Death by GREENING!
11 responses |
Started by metmike - May 11, 2021, 2:31 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/69258/
We are killing the planet for sure in other ways but at the same time, gifting it with beneficial CO2!
The real environmental crisis's/insects dying-dead zones-aquifers drying up-plastics in the ocean-landfills/trash-over consumption of natural resources-REAL POLLUTION(metmike is a PRACTICING environmentalist): April 2019
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/27498/
Ironically, we will be killing the planet MUCH, MUCH faster with all the FAKE green (anti environmental) energy (especially wind) that's 100 times worse than the CO2 that's greening up the planet.
Killing Coal
14 responses |
Started by metmike - Nov. 21, 2021, 10:57 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/78168/
Wind/ solar/batteries
16 responses |
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/69028/
All because of something that's greening up the planet!
Fake beer crisis/Death by GREENING!
11 responses |
Started by metmike - May 11, 2021, 2:31 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/69258/
We are killing the planet for sure in other ways but at the same time, gifting it with beneficial CO2.
Ironically, wasting trillions of dollars targeting the beneficial gas, CO2.....that could be used to fight real pollution. In fact, using some of those trillions to actually CREATE ANTI ENVIRONMENTAL ENERGY schemes, like with wind.
The real environmental crisis's/insects dying-dead zones-aquifers drying up-plastics in the ocean-landfills/trash-over consumption of natural resources-REAL POLLUTION(metmike is a PRACTICING environmentalist): April 2019
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/27498/
Ironically, we will be killing the planet MUCH, MUCH faster with all the FAKE green (anti environmental) energy (especially wind) that's 100 times worse than the CO2 that's greening up the planet.
Killing Coal
14 responses |
Started by metmike - Nov. 21, 2021, 10:57 p.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/78168/
Wind/ solar/batteries
16 responses |
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/69028/