LET'S ALL GET AN EV
7 responses | 0 likes
Started by 12345 - Nov. 18, 2022, 11:23 a.m.
Comments
By metmike - Nov. 18, 2022, 12:52 p.m.
Like Reply

They are selling us these things and disregarding the items that will make them NOT practical for many to most people.


Amongst other things, the number of stranded people with dead batteries is going to go up many hundreds of times. The inconvenience and lost time will be enormous.

I would get it if fossil fuels didn't exist and this was a new invention.

But we are discarding something 10 times better because of a fake climate crisis(science DISinformation and biased scientists/media/gate keepers), crony capitalism and political agenda/self serving motives with.

The switch away from fossil fuels is one of the biggest reasons for inflation. 

Cheap, reliable and abundant fossil fuels are the life blood to almost every developed country's economy. 

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/89811/#89912

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Electric Cars Still Face a Major Roadblock

https://www.aspenideas.org/articles/electric-cars-still-face-a-major-roadblock?utm_source=google&utm_medium=adgrant&utm_campaign=Dynamic&utm_term=&gclid=Cj0KCQiA99ybBhD9ARIsALvZavXjUxz3JdVs5l8UQF-rRIlA06edghltahZhZEWsphH50FtFGUer3lcaAsnpEALw_wcB

By joj - Nov. 20, 2022, 12:34 p.m.
Like Reply

Tesla EV sales:

20123,000Roadster, Model S
201322,477Model S
201431,655Model S
201550,658Model S, Model X (Q4 ’15)
201676,285Model S, Model X
2017103,181Model S/X, Model 3 (Q3 ’17)
2018245,506Model S/X, Model 3
2019354,245Model S/X, Model 3
2020499,647Model S/X, Model 3/Y
2021936,222Model S/X, Model 3/Y
By mcfarm - Nov. 20, 2022, 4:24 p.m.
Like Reply

ev cars? what are you thinking. I am going all the way to a ev combine. Of course it will not be practical, use able, fuel able or logical but what the hell. The libs will be celebrating and calling it a great success as it sits in the middle of the field with no power, no fuel, and no harvest. And I want to thank those same libs for killing our energy sector to the point of it costing me 12000/week for fuel for this years harvest. Yes over 5 dollars/gal since Sept here. You guys are the best. Add to that triple costs since Biden's election for fertilizer, chemicals and soon seed. Parts availability is a sad joke and if you are lucky enough to have any capitol to trade implements you will be 2 years out before your order is filled. Please continue on you fools.

By 12345 - Nov. 20, 2022, 6:32 p.m.
Like Reply

I THINK ALL OF THE GOVERNMENT VEHICLES (INCLUDING AIRCRAFT) SHOULD BE GROUNDED, IF THEY AREN'T ALL SWITCHED OVER TO EV POWER, WITHIN THE NEXT 2 WEEKS.

THE NEXT PARTY TO BE IN THE WHITE HOUSE (UNLESS IT'S THE SAME AS NOW) CAN CHOOSE WHATEVER MODE OF TRANSPORT THEY WANT... SOUNDS FAIR TO ME. ;)

By metmike - Nov. 20, 2022, 8:11 p.m.
Like Reply

Why Are Tesla Cars So Expensive?

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/032415/why-are-tesla-cars-so-expensive.asp

Key Takeaways

  • Tesla's electric vehicles (EVs) are generally more expensive than many other traditional or hybrid vehicles.
  • Tesla's cars range in price from around $120,000 for a Model X to about $47,000 for a Model 3.
  • A tax credit of up to $7,500 for new electric vehicles is now available through 2032 under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.
  • More expensive EVs, such as Tesla's Model S and Model X, do not qualify for the tax credit.
  • High demand for Teslas has led to a problem keeping up with production, leading to a waitlist of vehicles.
By metmike - Nov. 20, 2022, 8:18 p.m.
Like Reply
By metmike - Nov. 20, 2022, 8:25 p.m.
Like Reply

Most people buy electric vehicles because they want to help save the planet.

I don't doubt their authentic sincerity for a second. 


1. CO2 is a beneficial gas that is greening up the planet (that would prefer much more of it).

Death by Greening:
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/69258/

2. One of the more interesting notions is that somehow, the diffuse, intermittent and environment damaging solar and wind (with batteries) will be able to replace ALL our current electricity demand(which is proving unable to keep up with just the current demand) and in addition 40% MORE/NEW DEMAND from electric vehicles.

3. California tells electric car owners NOT to charge vehicles. Energy crisis in California because of unreliable, fake green/anti environmental energy! September 2022 https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/88534/ 

This could be the feature of a science fiction comedy if it weren't actually happening in real life with dangerous energy and economic consequences.

The laws of authentic energy, physics,science/biology/photosynthesis/environmentalism have not suddenly been repealed and replaced by the magical green energy fairy.

Crony capitalism, political agenda and self serving interests on the other hand have always grabbed as much power and money as they can using whatever strategy that works. That is exactly what's driving this movement. 

Wanna really help save the planet?

Forget the EV's, which are getting their electricity from fossil fuels not the magic green energy fairy. ......even if CO2 was hurting, not actually helping the planet.

Focus on the many TRUE environmental crisis's that the fake environmentalists getting rich and powerful on this movement never discuss. 

Isn't that odd?

All these real environmental issues below and all they want to discuss is the building block for all of life that's greening up the planet. 

Something ain't right there. The reason is that green new deals are enriching many of the big names selling them(who ironically are usually the biggest fossil fuel/energy burning, CO2 emitting people on the planet).


Thereal environmental crisis's/insects dying-dead zones-aquifers drying up-plastics in the ocean-landfills/trash-over consumption of natural resources-REAL pollution in the air/soil/water-WIND TURBINES (metmike is a PRACTICING environmentalist): April 2019

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/27498/


It just doesn't make sense that somebody for fossil fuels, like metmike could actually be an environmentalist.  Unless you can actually see the truth which is not part of the mainstream messages and actions that have completely won the agenda.

I fully acknowledge that. 

I'd be willing to bet everything, if I managed to live for 30 more years that I would get to see the complete exposure of this fraudulent movement and the world looking at this current time frame as the dark ages of climate science because of it being hijacked for politics, power and money.

Including by willing scientists, the vast majority that work for the government, many, especially those publishing get funded based on the climate crisis being a funding priority with massive billions available for that purpose.