I copied joj's post below that started a thread which is not allowing any comments for some odd reason.........at least not from me.
Started by joj - April 9, 2019, 4:28 p.m.
Watching Biden get smeared by Trump and supporters for his affectionate behavior is the height of irony.
It hasn't seem to hurt him in the polls.
Here are other examples of his "offensive" behavior.
Where were the outraged Biden supporters when Judge Cavanaugh was being brutally smeared?
Smearing is only smearing if the target is somebody that we like. When it's somebody like Trump..............who's been smeared for over 2 years by the MSM(around the clock every day at stations like CNN) and democrats............it's seen as him deserving every bit of it and more.
Right, like this Russian collusion hoax(just one example) was not used for 2 years.
It's perfectly ok to smear somebody that we despise and deserves it.
People like me, "climate deniers" have been smeared for over a decade now. Discredited because we have authentic facts/evidence that contradict the manufactured climate crisis.
I'm sure that you must remember watching numerous political ads on television from the last decade of elections that were 100%, pure smear campaigns against their opponent. This is the society that we live in and only being outraged when it happens to somebody that you like will continue to provide ammunition for it to continue(because its designed to hurt people that we don't already like).
They are all repugnant to me............from both sides but because Biden is the guy who is the front runner, potentially facing Trump in the 2020, we are getting these interpretations, like its shocking and a "new" tactic from a person(Trump) that is so easy to hate.
If you are allowing/have allowed any aspect of the Biden or Cavanugh stories to in any way affect your opinion of people or events, other than seeing them for the preposterous nonsense that they are, you are admitting that you allow yourself to be told what to think and how to react to anything.
A lot of people are running for president as they they think it will look bad on Trump if they are charged. He is too busy running the country to worry about those sort of things
If Cavanaugh's accuser, who was willing to take a lie detector test, and who had corroborating testimony from multiple people at the time of the alleged sexual assault was a fabrication then she is guilty of perjury and should be prosecuted. If not, then you are comparing sexual assault to excessive hugging.
12 women stepped forward to describe Trump's sexual aggressive behavior, which probably means he engaged in that activity over a 100 times. And he admitted to it in a boasting fashion. That he and his supporters then attack Biden, is beyond the pale.
Now please respond with Climate debate references.
You just proved my points below by providing the bogus Kavanaugh facts that one side used(that you line up with) to justify the abhorrent smearing, which again, were:
"Smearing is only smearing if the target is somebody that we like.
"It's perfectly ok to smear somebody that we despise and deserves it."
"Now please respond with Climate debate references."
You have either been living in a cave or are just looking for an argument.
The concerted effort to discredit the scientific consensus over man-made global warming has been continuing for two decades in the United States, and shows no sign of weakening.
Dr. Spencer is a top authority on climate science and been smeared for over a decade.
Obama was noted for calling us deniers but also coined the term "flat earthers" What's funny about his tweet(lie)below is that us deniers, have a hard time finding anybody to debate us on the climate science that they insist is settled(would give our points too much credibility they say). So the manufactured crisis scheme that involves smearing the side that disagrees, tries to make you think that other side is afraid to debate them.........when everything is the complete opposite of that.
"Climate deniers in Congress refuse to even debate the issue. Make sure they don't get away with it"
Here's the proof of that last statement. Please watch this video below and see what side wants to debate the truth and what side refused:
Global Warming - Dr. Gavin Schmidt Versus Dr. Roy Spencer
Stossel invited a dozen scientists to debate "denier" Dr. Spencer on the science..........they all refused. Dr. Schmidt agreed to come on as long as there was no debate and he was only allowed to repeat his prepared statementments without being challenged or debated by the climate scientist "denier"
There's a good reason why nobody would come on to debate Dr. Spencer..........this would have exposed the weaknesses in the climate crisis theory which is entirely based on programmed model simulations that are busting in the real world..................so they just smear the guy.
"If Cavanaugh's accuser, who was willing to take a lie detector test, and who had corroborating testimony from multiple people at the time of the alleged sexual assault was a fabrication then she is guilty of perjury and should be prosecuted. If not, then you are comparing sexual assault to excessive hugging."
This is nonsense.
She, after therapy, recalled that she was assaulted by a group that included Cavanaugh. She doesn't remember where or when. The collaborating testimoney was from people swearng she remember these events. None frompeople who were actually there. Her li detector test was a carefully screened event that proved nothing. Add the fact that all this "damning evidence", known for months in advance, was released on the eve of the confirmation
If you give this more than 3 seconds of attention, you are admitting that you can be told what to think and how to react to anything.