Attacking Barr to discredit the no collusion/obstruction finding
1 response | 0 likes
Started by metmike - April 17, 2019, 1:35 a.m.

The MSM was wrong about collusion (and obstruction) but now they are trying to make the case of a cover up by Barr.

Barr Has a History of Writing Summaries That Obscure the Truth

Judge: Barr sowing public mistrust with Mueller report handling

“The attorney general has created an environment that has caused a significant part of the public … to be concerned about whether or not there is full transparency,” U.S. District Court Judge Reggie Walton said during a hearing Tuesday afternoon on a Freedom of Information Act suit demanding access to a report detailing the findings of special counsel Robert Mueller."

Ahhhhh,  the mainstream media  framing this as a cover up by Barr isn't contributing? Is it a cover up?

It will be framed as that unless the MSM gets something from him that they can use against Trump. Probably there are some things in it that they can use if the entire unredacted report is released(speculation).

Good article from Time: "Everyone Got to Read the Starr Report on Bill Clinton. Here’s Why the Mueller Report May Not Get the Same Treatment"

By mcfarm - April 17, 2019, 6:08 a.m.
Like Reply

attacking Barr? No way. OHHH you men like cnn spending an hour last nite cutting and pasting Barr statements from the 1980's to fit their scenario.  Hell next they find some wacked out women to accuse him of having a beer