Back to Index Reply to Topic Like This Topic
beto going wacko
17 responses | 0 likes
Started by mcfarm - Aug. 27, 2019, 6:31 p.m.

so the question comes from the crowd. Would it of been ok if my mom aborted me 1 day before my full term ninth month birthday? This idiot, running for President then proceeds to say..."glad you are here tonite" BUT.BUT...that decision is the mothers and the mothers alone

not to out do himself he then blames the entire drought in Guatamala on who? Rich white Americans are the cause and the only cause and we should all be ashamed of that fact and science is what tells him we rich White Americans are to blame. 


and we thought just yesterday Biden was the crazy one!!!!!!!

Comments
Re: beto going wacko
0 likes
By metmike - Aug. 27, 2019, 7:12 p.m.
Like Reply

There has always been drought on this planet.

History tells us that something like 30% of the world has at least slight drought. 20% has moderate drought and 10% severe drought at any one time. That area moves around so while drought is ending in some places, it's starting or getting worse in other places.

In today's world of the fake climate crisis, every drought is caused by man made climate change and global droughts are getting much worse because of it. The graph below, exposes that as a lie.

Interesting graph – Fraction of the Globe in Drought: 1982-2012

 

/ May 22, 2014


https://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/05/22/interesting-graph-fraction-of-the-globe-in-drought-1982-2012/


Image result for global drought wuwt

Re: Re: beto going wacko
0 likes
By metmike - Aug. 27, 2019, 7:15 p.m.
Like Reply

Maybe people in the US would like the good old "natural" climate that we had in the days before man made climate change.

Let's go back to the 1930's in the USA for an extreme version of the OLD climate:


https://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/10/14/nasa-study-finds-1934-had-worst-drought-of-last-thousand-years/

The map below is the drought index in 1934. This was one of the worst times during a drought that lasted for much of that entire decade. It was not permanent climate change and more of a freak weather phenomena. Human's poor farming strategies in those days did make things worse but today's climate change makes a drought lasting that long much LESS likely to happen.

Can you imagine if we had this going on today?



Brown colors of the PDSI indicate strong drought conditions across the U.S., in summer of 1934.


 It would absolutely be seen as the affects of human caused climate change............and I do believe there has been man made climate change, which is why the Cornbelt and your crops have been treated to the longest stretch of drought free conditions in recorded history.

Only 1 major, widespread drought in the Cornbelt from 1988 to 2019(2012).......over 3 decades, when the average historically was over 1/decade(if you throw out the 1930's as an aberration.

Instead of having the average 3 major droughts in the Cornbelt over the last 30 years, during (so called catastrophic) human caused climate change, there has only been 1.........along with the increasing CO2 causing yields to go up 25% from atmospheric fertilization because of the proven law of photosynthesis.


Here's what temperatures were like during the Dust Bowl 1930's.


  • Line graph showing values of the U.S. Heat Wave Index for each year from 1895 to 2015.
Re: Re: Re: beto going wacko
0 likes
By metmike - Aug. 27, 2019, 7:23 p.m.
Like Reply

Beto and friends want us to buy into their Green New Deal which they say is imperative if we want to save the planet within 12 years as a consequence of the increase in CO2.


If he would just open his eyes and look, he would see that CO2 and the Green New Deal have already been in effect for the past 40 years based on the actual laws of science/nature, which corrupt politicians, fake environmentalists and fake news MSM people could not stop.

The real  world Green New Deal below!

Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds                   

      https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth

From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.

globe of Earth from North Pole perspective
Re: Re: Re: Re: beto going wacko
0 likes
By metmike - Aug. 27, 2019, 7:31 p.m.
Like Reply

Even deserts are greening up!

Deserts greening up from rising CO2 below:

https://phys.org/news/2013-07-greening-co2.html

     
                                
                    Deserts 'greening' from rising CO2

           

Increased levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) have helped boost green foliage across the world's arid regions over the past 30 years through a process called CO2 fertilisation, according to CSIRO research.                                               

                       
                                                                                

In findings based on , CSIRO, in collaboration with the Australian National University (ANU), found that this CO2 correlated with an 11 per cent increase in foliage cover from 1982-2010 across parts of the arid areas studied in Australia, North America, the Middle East and Africa, according to CSIRO research scientist, Dr Randall Donohue.

Re: Re: beto going wacko
0 likes
By metmike - Aug. 27, 2019, 7:40 p.m.
Like Reply

But hold on, these bin busting crop yields, greening planet, booming biosphere and life flourishing(polar bear number +25% since 2005) are actually a bad thing according the way that some in the MSM want to spin it so that it matches up with their manufactured  fake climate crisis(which they are now calling a climate emergency to try to scare you even more).


According to the NY Times, the greening planet is BAD!

‘Global Greening’ Sounds Good. In the Long Run, It’s Terrible.

Rising carbon dioxide levels are making the world greener. But that’s nothing to celebrate. 

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/30/science/climate-change-plants-global-greening.html

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/07/31/nyt-global-greening-faster-plant-growth-is-bad/

I'm sure that joj really enjoyed reading that article from his favorite source. 

Re: Re: Re: beto going wacko
0 likes
By metmike - Aug. 27, 2019, 7:48 p.m.
Like Reply

Yeah, right NY Times. Models, the MSM and one party  have been telling us for 2 decades about how the climate crisis was going to ruin our crops because of hot and dry weather and flooding. 

All the humans know this ..............but you forgot to tell the crops (-:


https://www.nass.usda.gov/Charts_and_Maps/Field_Crops/soyyld.php


Soybeans: Yield by Year, US


There obviously are other contributing factors with genetics and farming technology (+75%) but the +CO2 and weather(+25%) have been a big plus.

With Corn, it's a different picture because of the  introduction of nitrogen fertilizer causing corn yields to triple real fast and not as much to do with CO2 or weather during that initial tripling. However, recent decades have featured a steady increase, along with a steady increase in CO2 and beneficial weather.

http://crazyeddiethemotie.blogspot.com/2014/10/corn-questions-from-food-inc-worksheet.html




Re: Re: Re: Re: beto going wacko
0 likes
By metmike - Aug. 27, 2019, 7:49 p.m.
Like Reply

World cereal markets remain well balanced in 2018/19

http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/csdb/en/

Estimates for global cereal production, utilization and stocks raised sharply following historical adjustments for China  

Release date: 04/04/2019








Re: Re: beto going wacko
0 likes
By metmike - Aug. 27, 2019, 7:55 p.m.
Like Reply

We also need to make sure that nobody knows that over 100 scientific studies found that it was this warm or warmer 1,000 years ago-Medeival Warm Period.

Also 2,000 years ago-Roman Warm Period  and 3,500 years ago-Minoan Warm Period.


Here are the studies(hundreds on the map below), most of which, by a wide margin, show that the Medieval Warm Period was warmer than this:



Medieval Warm Period Project:
http://www.co2science.org/data/mwp/mwpp.php


MWP-CWP Qualitative Temperature Differentials - CO2 Science
www.co2science.org
Figure Description: The distribution of Level 2 Studies that allow one to determine whether peak Medieval Warm Period temperatures were warmer than (red), equivalent ...



For the Medieval Warm Period compared to today below:

Red balloons showed it was warmer.

Blue was colder than today(in that study)

Green was wetter/more precip

Yellow was drier

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/01/03/documenting-the-global-extent-of-the-medieval-warm-period/

fig-1-screenshot-of-mwp-project

Re: Re: beto going wacko
0 likes
By metmike - Aug. 27, 2019, 8 p.m.
Like Reply

Here is the biggest secret..............It was much warmer than this in the high latitudes between 9,000 to 5,000 years ago.

Up until climate science was hijacked for political agenda, conditions this warm were understood by all of science to be a planetary climate OPTIMUM.

Here in 2019, the verbiage has been changed so that an optimum, we are to believe is a crisis.............no, wait, that's not extreme enough, now it's being called an emergency.

And the Holocene Climate Optimum from 5,000-9,000 years ago was even warmer than the Medieval Warm Period.


Holocene climatic optimum

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_climatic_optimum


"Out of 140 sites across the western Arctic, there is clear evidence for conditions warmer than now at 120 sites. At 16 sites, where quantitative estimates have been obtained, local HTM temperatures were on average 1.6±0.8 °C higher than now."


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ca/Holocene_Temperature_Variations.png

Temperature variations during the Holocene from a collection of different reconstructions and their average. The most recent period is on the right, but the recent warming is only seen in the inset.


Re: Re: Re: beto going wacko
0 likes
By metmike - Aug. 27, 2019, 8:04 p.m.
Like Reply

People like me are being called deniers.

Who's denying anything. Look below. Sea levels are increasing:

Sea levels have been rising at 1 inch/decade = around 1 foot/century over the last 150 years. Today, it's around 1.3 inches/decade.


https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/post-glacial_sea_level.png

https://curryja.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/post-glacial_sea_level.png

                                    

            

                

Re: Re: Re: beto going wacko
0 likes
By metmike - Aug. 27, 2019, 8:07 p.m.
Like Reply

This is the graph of temperatures going up in the satellite era. Yes they are going up.

https://www.drroyspencer.com/latest-global-temperatures/

Latest Global Temps

Re: Re: Re: Re: beto going wacko
0 likes
By metmike - Aug. 27, 2019, 8:13 p.m.
Like Reply

Hurricanes have not increased 

Hurricanes & climate change: detection

 February 18, 2019

 From Dr. Judith Curry’s Climate Etc.


https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/02/18/hurricanes-climate-change-detection/


Figur


and in fact, violent tornadoes have decreased, not in spite of climate change but because of it...........warming of the higher latitudes:


https://www.drroyspencer.com/2019/05/recent-tornadoes-are-due-to-unusually-cold-weather/




Or, phrased another way, the last half of the 65-year U.S. tornado record had 40% fewer strong to violent tornadoes than the first half.

 

To claim that global warming is causing more tornadoes is worse than speculative; it is directly opposite to the clear observational evidence.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: beto going wacko
0 likes
By metmike - Aug. 27, 2019, 8:22 p.m.
Like Reply

So where is the bad stuff which is causing the climate crisis/emergency?

Beto says a drought in Guatemala?


I remember the extreme drought in California being used the same way a few years ago. As I mentioned, droughts come and go naturally on this planet, which thanks to climate change and the extra CO2 is greening up.


That natural, severe drought that California had, which we were told was a permanent change because of the climate crisis..........is no longer.

California’s ‘permanent drought’ is now washed away by reality

 

/ March 11, 2019


https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/03/11/californias-permanent-drought-is-now-washed-away-by-reality/


From 2014, spot the portion caused by “man-made climate change”:

 

California_drought_timeline

 "Here’s how much recent rains have washed away California’s drought"

https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/03/07/heres-how-much-recent-rains-have-washed-away-californias-drought/


"Less than 1 percent of the state is in any kind of drought status, down from 48 percent a year ago"



Re: Re: Re: beto going wacko
0 likes
By metmike - Aug. 27, 2019, 8:24 p.m.
Like Reply

And the lunacy of using California's drought as an example:

The climate models projecting the future, which is what was being used by Sanders to sell his climate crisis  in N. California last week...........(worse droughts and wildfires), show the OPPOSITE of what Bernie claims. This is because of the warmer Pacific Ocean(more El Nino's and increased precipitation that it will cause in N.California. Warmer air also holds more moisture, which is why global precipitation has gone UP not down. 


California projected to get wetter through this century


https://phys.org/news/2017-07-california-wetter-century.html

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: beto going wacko
0 likes
By mcfarm - Aug. 27, 2019, 8:27 p.m.
Like Reply

MM, I would pay major bucks just to witness you on stage debating our climate with those 30 or so fools running for lib President. In minutes you would of undressed them all!!!!

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: beto going wacko
0 likes
By metmike - Aug. 27, 2019, 8:38 p.m.
Like Reply

Thanks mcfarm,

Unfortunately, cognitive bias and most people already thinking they know what they don't really know on this topic would cause everything I stated to bounce off their brains like rain off of a persons  raincoat in a flash flood, while that person remains convinced and insists there is a drought, even while they witness their car being swept away by the flood water.

The saddest thing of all, is that Trump has been very outspoken about the climate crisis being a hoax( and bashed relentlessly for pulling out of the fraudulent Climate Accord) and if there is anything that will drive them deeper into their flawed belief system about the climate, it's Trump stating that its flawed. 

Seriously. The objective is to take the opposite positions of Trump.


Trump wants to enforce laws and require the immigration process to follow laws that have existed forever and make sense in every country in the world.

They want open borders, illegal immigrants and free healthcare for them.

Trump increases our energy independence(something Americans dreamed about for decades) as we even become an exporter of oil and natural gas.

They want to do the opposite. Banish fossil fuels and kill the economy. 

Trump withdraws from the bogus climate accord that would do nothing except take money from rich countries and hurt their economies from cutting back on cheap, reliable;e and abundant fossil fuels.  They take it to an even greater extreme...........they want to get rid of fossil fuels completely which would kill our economy.


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: beto going wacko
0 likes
By metmike - Aug. 27, 2019, 9:28 p.m.
Like Reply

And minutes after me making that last post,  we have another mind boggling example of it.

We all know about Trump's trade war with China. We may not agree with Trumps tactics but we know he has the moral/ethical and fair minded position. 

You would think that nobody except China would be on China's side.


Sanders praises China's leadership in interview

           by           Joseph Simonson          

          

           | August 27, 2019 

"They're a country that vigorously protects their own interests," the Vermont senator said in an interview with The Hill. "But what we have to say about China, in fairness to China and its leadership, is if I'm not mistaken, they have made more progress in addressing extreme poverty than any country in the history of civilization, okay? So they've done a lot of things for their people."


metmike: What the heck? is Sanders suffering SEVERE dementia?

The Chinese are some of the most oppressed people on the planet and they suffer extreme human rights violations that are completely unacceptable by any standards. 

China is inventing a whole new way to oppress a people

https://nypost.com/2018/09/17/china-is-inventing-a-whole-new-way-to-oppress-a-people/

The Chinese government’s oppression extends far beyond Uighurs    

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/readersreact/la-ol-le-china-uighur-20190626-story.html

Human rights in China

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_China


See why this is one of the most outrageous, hypocritical  things ever stated by a politician, to completely contradict everthing that they say they stand for, here: Scroll down at this link"

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/37437/


Forum Category List
Category Total Topics
Home
NTR 8720
Trading 7863
Forum Display Options
New Topic Index Refresh Log-In
Quotes
VIEW PORTFOLIO
Futures & Options
Market Sectors: Index/Minis – Currencies
Energy – Financials – Softs – Grains
Meats – Metals
News & Commentary
INO.com Futures Commentary
INO.com Blog
The Wall Street Journal
BBC News
Reuters
CNBC
Barchart.com Commodities Quotes
Fox Business
Bond News
About Us
Privacy Policy
Disclaimers
Contact Moderator