Twitter has suspend several of my friends accounts just for re-tweeting the hashtag #ExposeCNN last night. What the hell is going on here
?
Jack can use all the algorithms he wants, but as soon as
shares this it will all be useless #ExposeCNN
Quote Tweet
James O'Keefe
@JamesOKeefeIII
·
PART 1: CNN Insider Blows Whistle, Secretly Records Staff, Execs and Network President Jeff Zucker’s "Anti-Trump Crusade" and "Personal Vendetta" Against POTUS. #ExposeCNN Full video uploading now...sign up now to get each new tape first: http://exposecnn.com
2:19
#ExposeCNN while we wait, let’s get it trending! How many likes and RTs can this get?!
RT mitchellvii "RT JamesOKeefeIII: The hashtag #ExposeCNN about our upcoming cnn staffer who wore a hidden camera and will blow whistle on CNN has 35,000 tweets, 290 tweets per minute — and is not trending. I can’t wait until the next shoe to drop... "
0:28From James O'Keefe
·
Video of CNN President Jeff Zucker: “Let’s just stay very focused on Impeachment” #ExposeCNN2:05From James O'Keefe
JUST IN: Our
insider overheard network President Jeff Zucker talking about #ExposeCNN on the 9am call...this morning... He is STILL on the inside.0:30From James O'Keefe
A quick update on the fact that our
insider has gotten access to network President Jeff Zucker’s 9am editorial meetings. EVEN TODAY HE IS STILL RECORDING #ExposeCNNhttp://exposecnn.com1:35
The insider who works for CNN is willing to go public, and we will show our sit down interview with him imminently. #ExposeCNN
Quote Tweet
JW
@Orionzdrm
·
Replying to @JamesOKeefeIII and @CNN
Jesus man don’t expose your source.
You sure you aren't worried Jeff? #ExposeCNNhttp://exposecnn.com
0:30
·
#BeBrave do something #ExposeCNN Tic toc- countdown begins
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/14/trump-condemns-video-showing-him-killing-media-outlets.html
https://www.projectveritas.com/2019/10/14/exposecnnpart1/
You can sign up to have this sent to your email address by using info at that link.
Regulars here already knew how biased CNN is:
"Avenatti was interviewed on broadcast and cable news networks 214 times from March to November 2018"
https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/25/avenatti-cnn-msnbc-interviews-before-indictment/
https://www.lamag.com/citythinkblog/michael-avenatti-prison/
Michael Avenatti Faces 36 New Counts and Up to 335 Years in prison.
From CNN:
"The former chairman of the Psychiatry Department at Duke University claimed on CNN that President Trump is as bad as the worst dictators of the 20th century, and that his presidency might lead to even more deaths than they did."
To make it "authentic" for you: Snopes
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/psychiatrist-hitler-stalin-and-mao/
Keep in mind that 8% of the US population are people that are progressive activists but possibly 50% of the MSM are progressive activists.
My opinion based on objective observations is that all the main anchors at CNN and CNBC are progressive activists.
So what do you expect?
Of course guys like Shaun Hannity represent the exact opposite on Fox.
metmike: I'm just passing today's version along since the first one got posted yesterday. Frankly, I don't see anything scandalous about this at all. It's already a very well known fact with much more powerful evidence than this(the quotes and recordings in this story seem pretty weak to me) from stuff like the above post that shows how they elevated Michael Avenatti to a daily interview for months in order to get Trump.
I watched an opinion piece done by CNN on the apparent flip flop of republicans on the subpoena power of congress during Clinton/Obama investigations and the current Trump investigation(s). I won't bother with the differences and/or validity of the investigations as that's a whole 'nother debate anyway. Taken on the surface, the pubs most certainly hold/present different views now as opposed to then. A flip flop by a politician!!! <GASP> No doubt pubs invested that.
But what was conspicuously missing from this "balanced" view was the opinion from democrats on the subpoena power of congress during the Clinton/Obama investigations and the current investigations. At the least, as "stark" of a contrast. But then, what did that have to do with the story/message?