When I think of this particular MSM source, I am always reminded of their anti science, anti objectivity and anti free speech belief that they display in real life(while pretending to be the complete opposite).

Funny stuff going on in journalism today.

The source that I randomly picked states this at the end of all their articles, and use it in asking for your donations:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/16/guardian-language-changes-climate-environment

"These are perilous times. And we're asking for your help as we prepare for 2020. Over the last three years, much of what the Guardian holds dear has been threatened - democracy, civility, truth. This US administration is establishing new norms of behaviour. Anger and cruelty disfigure public discourse and lying is commonplace. Truth is being chased away. But with your help we can continue to put it center stage. 

Rampant disinformation, partisan news sources and social media's tsunami of fake news is no basis on which to inform the American public in 2020. The need for a robust, independent press has never been greater, and with your help we can continue to provide fact-based reporting that offers public scrutiny and oversight. We are also committed to keeping our journalism open and accessible to everyone and with your help we can keep it that way."

metmike: The reality is that they are being disingenuous/dishonest. They are the polar opposite of what they claim to be. Check this out. They have ordered their editors/journalists/reporters to use scarier terms/language to propagandize the fake climate emergency:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/16/guardian-language-changes-climate-environment

"In addition to providing updated guidelines on which images our editors should use to illustrate the climate emergency, we have updated our style guide to introduce terms that more accurately describe the environmental crises facing the world. Our editor-in-chief, Katharine Viner, said: “We want to ensure that we are being scientifically precise, while also communicating clearly with readers on this very important issue”. These are the guidelines provided to our journalists and editors to be used in the production of all environment coverage across the Guardian’s website and paper"

Here is where they acknowledge collusion by the MSM of acting in unison to propagandize their readers.

"Since we announced these changes, they have been reported widely, shared across social media channels, and even prompted some other media outlets to reconsider the terms they use in their own coverage."

metmike: If it seems like the MSM are all reporting the exact same things from the same points of view, it's not your imagination. They are acting as the gatekeepers of information with the same belief system as half of the anchors and journalists are progressive activists who choose that field because it gives them the power to impose their belief system on people that read or view their interpretations of what we should know. 

There IS an intentional conspiracy by the MSM on certain political  topics......... fake climate emergency, President Trump for instance and the objective is to brainwash the people, not objectively report the news.

               "Word of the year-climate emergency"            

https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/43226/

Again, on most posts here, I show tons of links.........the evidence to support the words. Words are cheap. Authentic facts, data and evidence trump them. 

They are using false narratives and manufactured news. They are not reporting the objective news, they are using the news to influence how we think. They are ignoring all the news that disagrees with their belief system and/or twisting the news like a pretzel so that it appears to us to be confirming their belief system. 

They are changing the language to brainwash us, like George Orwell's 1984.

The current climate optimum was first referred to as global warming, then climate change but that wasn't scary enough......so climate crisis and even that wasn't scary enough, so now its climate emergency. They have ordered their reporters to use that verbiage.

People that disagree with them, even esteemed Phd's in climate science are referred to as Deniers, a negative reference they want us to make with the  Holocaust Deniers.  They have ordered their reporters to use that verbiage.

Completely beneficial, increasing CO2 that's greening up the planet(based on all authentic science) is now called "carbon pollution" (based 100% on politics).

Trump is referred to as a racist, Nazi, xenophobe, white supremacist......over and over until people believe it. We heard that he colluded with Russia for 2 years. We heard that his using the term "invaders" for the illegal immigrants invading our southern border was racist and caused the mass shooting because the shooter, out of thousands of words also used invaders. 

When he told us about the killing of the most evil person on the planet, 64% of the MSM stories criticized him and none of them congratulated him.

They are controlling what we read and hear with fake news, half truths and twisted interpretations. 

The saddest part in all of this is the tremendous anxiety that they are creating in millions of people. Here we are, living in the best time of human history with thousands of wonderful things to be grateful for and they are scaring the daylights out of people, by insisting that we are destroying the planet and in 12 years, there will be an apocalypse.  Children never pay much attention to politics but in this case, the fake climate emergency scare is a huge exception. Many young people are needing psychiatric counseling because they are so petrified and believe in the climate emergency destroying the planet. 

Think about it. If you really thought the world as you know it was going to be a barren wasteland by the time you became an adult, you would be petrified. Children are not thinking that way because they are getting the wrong message. This is 100%, absolutely intentional. The objective is to petrify people so people will do what they say.  

They supposedly know the secret to controlling the weather and climate and we must do exactly as they say or we will all perish.

Then there's the intense hatred they are causing. They hate Trump and want everyone  else to hate him too. They want people to hate the anti Greta and "deniers" like me because we are getting in the way of them saving the planet. Hate is the most destructive emotion a human can have. 

I don't hate them but am trying to save the planet.............from the monumental damage that would be done by eliminating fossil fuels and doing what they want you to do............ and the monumental damage that is being done to authentic climate science.............and the monumental damage that is being done to the minds of our young people, who they are intentionally scaring the crap out of with the fake climate emergency............and the monumental damage being done to everybody that is getting dumber, every time they read another article that contradicts authentic observations/empirical data/science  but was written to impose their belief system.

Hello George Orwell and 1984!

The gatekeepers in this case have completely taken control of the language and how the news is reported.    

Mostly one side is told and its blatantly distorted/exaggerated frequently.            

I may be an atmospheric scientist that knows about all the data but why are no MSM sources using any of this same data that is easily accessible to anybody that can use the internet?

It should be the responsibility of an objective, professional journalist to report this authentic data/science.  But the progressive activist in them takes over and the cause justifies the means philosophy frame of mind justifies their unethical behavior.............disguised as  "fighting" supposedly unethical positions like mine.