Yeah, we're abandoning our youth to tjhe horrors of climate change thanks to Manchin.
My absolute favorite line from this drivel...
Climate change is now a mental health issue.
Newsflash.. Climate change has always been a mental health issue.
Too funny on the mental health issues being caused by the best weather and climate for life on this planet in over 1,000 years. Previously defined as a climate OPTIMUM, the last time it was this warm but this time, they hijacked climate science for the political agenda and redefined everything, including exaggerated and misinterpreting all extreme weather and blaming all of it on the slight, beneficial global warming.
There really is something called eco-anxiety affecting millions of young people in the world who are petrified that there will be no planet left for them when they grow up.
But this condition was intentionally created by governments and fraudulent climate crisis sources.
Scare the Doo Doo out of people so they will get behind the war on fossil fuels.
Peoples mental health is not being affected by the actual extreme weather more than previously as much as they are reacting to what they are being told about the weather and climate.
Imagine if you really were totally convinced by the manufactured crisis narrative that we really are destroying the planet. Think about how profoundly horrific that is for the human race and most of life!!
They have people convinced that all extreme weather and bad things are the result of global warming......including extreme cold and heavy snows.
No doubt that people’s mental health truly is getting messed up bad.....but not for the reasons that they claim.
Not because of the weather.
Because of the apocolypic made up things that people have been convinced to believe that the weather and climate will cause.
So what is it that they say is so bad about this natural (for the most part) global warming?
Everyone just raves when we have a Spring like day during winter.Lets just de-salinate the rising oceans and pump it up to Lake Mead so we can help irrigate the greening planet which will feed the world.
Polar bears?-doesn't seem they're hurting much and besides, their over abundance, much like the bald eagle's will utilize a lot of that wasted food in the dumpsters when they start sharing the spoils. Landfill crisis partly solved.
I better quit now and go join the party.
Merry Christmas
John
Thanks John!
Just the opposite of the polar bears being threatened happened.
Their population has increased 30% since 2005.
Polar Bears
Started by metmike - Sept. 26, 2020, 2:51 a.m.
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/59529/
"This new estimate for 2018 is a modest 4-6 fold increase over the 10,000 or so bears that existed in the 1960s and after 25 years, a credible increase over the estimate of 25,000 that the PBSG offered in 1993 (Wiig et al. 1995).
However, my new estimate is much larger than the improbable figure of about 26,000 (range 22,000-31,000) offered by PGSG biologists in 2015 (Regehr et al. 2016; Wiig et al. 2015). The scary question is this: what do Arctic residents do if there are actually as many as 58,000?"
+++++++++++++++++++
Here's my polar bear news:
"In 2005, the official global polar bear estimate was about 22,500.
Since 2005, however, the estimated global polar bear population has risen by more than 30% to about 30,000 bears, far and away the highest estimate in more than 50 years.
A growing number of observational studies have documented that polar bears are thriving, despite shrinking summer sea ice. "
Get your real polar bear science here:
https://polarbearscience.com/2019/02/
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"In 2005, the official global polar bear estimate was about 22,500.
Since 2005, however, the estimated global polar bear population has risen by more than 30% to about 30,000 bears, far and away the highest estimate in more than 50 years.
A growing number of observational studies have documented that polar bears are thriving, despite shrinking summer sea ice. "
Polar Bear Numbers Could Have Quadrupled
https://www.thegwpf.org/polar-bear-numbers-could-have-quadrupled/
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Here's an example of their news:
"The "fake news" narrative was viewed by over 2.5 billion sets of eyes, becoming the magazine's most viral video in their history."
How many of those 2.5 billion, looked at the video and also knew about the actual data about polar bears thriving with their population exploding higher as proved by the facts on the previous page?(keep in mind, the gatekeepers intentionally do NOT share the real data with you)
How many looked at the video and let it affect their opinion on climate change?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
https://www.thegwpf.com/death-of-a-climate-icon/
Another absurd study that supposedly finds people's psychological stress tied to climate change.
No, it's not from real climate change. It's from sources scaring them with a fake climate crisis narrative.........that we are destroying our planet>
This was my comment:
Mike Maguire
December 23, 2021 2:35 pm
So it’s the government’s fault for not fixing the fake climate crisis that they manufactured……..and not the government’s fault for manufacturing the climate crisis.
What’s ironic is that eco-anxiety is INTENTIONALLY being created. It’s the completely desired response to scaring people with exaggerations about the end of the planet, to justify actions by the government to eliminate fossil fuels.
They’re blaming the right entity but are confused about the reason. The governments intentionally created this problem (that didn’t exist before the fake climate crisis) so that dumb reports like this one can tell us that the same people need to fix it with actions, which is exactly what they want. To generate support to fix the problem they manufactured. That’s what this report is all about.
The smartest fix for this non climate problem……..is to just stop intentionally scaring people to convince them there is a problem………so that you can use the manufactured problem and their supposed fix……….to eliminate fossil fuels.
Just tell the entire objective truth about the climate(and weather) ………….and all the problems go away with the least amount of effort and least amount of deceit and the least cost.
Oh, but then we would be stuck with those dang cheap, reliable, abundant, practical and power charged fossil fuels.
As I've said more than once.. If you want to see a real climate crisis, watch what happens if the global temps drop a couple degrees. The mass starvation alone will have people wishing for the current "Climate Crisis".
If we had a climate time machine that could send it back 100 years, so that the temperature was 1 deg C cooler and the CO2 was back below 300 parts per million from the current 420 ppm what would happen?
Within 3 years, 1 billion people would starve to death. As food/production of everything that grows(cotton too) plunged, stocks of everything would quickly go to near 0. We would hit severe price rationing markets in every market with prices tripling or higher until enough people died and prices got so high that demand was curtailed to meet the incredible shortage in supply.
This is because of the indisputable link between plant growth/crop yields and CO2 levels.....the law of photosynthesis.
It varies a bit from plant to plant but on average, for every 5 ppm that you increase CO2, the increase in growth is around 1%. So when we increased CO2 by 125 ppm, we increased world food production by roughly 25%.
We know this from all the scientific studies done to test all plants under enriched CO2 environments.
We can only make an estimated guess about the contribution for the global warming part. I'll be conservative and say 10% but having accurate data to prove that is impossible because of the tons of conflicting data.
More heat in the Summer vs less cold and less freeze damage. Too much rain and planting delays vs more rains and LESS drought.
We have a Christmas celebration to go to then I'll provide the links with the data to prove it.
This thread from the Climate Reality discussions is loaded with data on studies of plants/crops with elevated CO2:
Optimal CO2 for life more than double current level: See the proof with thousands of studies. Showing Scientific American.....and mainstream science sold to us........ to be wrong about plants and the affects from Climate Change. December 2020
https://www.marketforum.com/forum/topic/62784/
These are all the discussions: