‘To the End’ a fearless foursome tackling the climate crisis
3 responses | 0 likes
Started by metmike - Dec. 14, 2022, 9:54 p.m.


Science FICTION, DISinformation, JUNK science and an ideology that has hijacked authentic climate science and is using it for their agenda.

Scaring people, especially children INTENTIONALLY for their self serving interests is damaging their minds and hurting society.

Terrified of Climate Change? You Might Have Eco-Anxiety



What to know about eco-anxiety

Written by Jennifer Huizen on December 19, 2019  Medical news


Eco-anxiety refers to a fear of environmental damage or ecological disaster. This sense of anxiety is largely based on the current and predicted future state of the environment and human-induced climate change.

According to a 2018 national survey, almost 70% of people in the United States are worried about climate change, and around 51% feel “helpless.”

Anxiety around environmental issues may stem from the awareness of a rising risk of extreme weather events, losses of livelihood or housing, fears for future generations, and feelings of helplessness.

This article discusses eco-anxiety, including what it is, the common symptoms, and how to spot and manage it.

The Environmental Burden of Generation Z


Washington Post

"Kids are terrified, anxious and depressed about climate change. Whose fault is that?"

Children suffering eco-anxiety over climate change, say psychologists



Psychologists Warn Parents, Climate Change Alarmists Against Causing 'Eco-Anxiety' in Children

9/17/19 Newsweek


Children With “Eco-Anxiety” Are Being Seen By Specialists. Should You Be Concerned?

IFL Science:


Parents told not to terrify children over climate change as rising numbers treated for 'eco-anxiety'


"Rising numbers of children are being treated for “eco-anxiety”, experts have said, as they warn parents against “terrifying” their youngsters with talk of climate catastrophe.

Protests by groups such as Extinction Rebellion, the recent fires in the Amazon and apocalyptic warnings by the teenage activist Greta Thunberg have prompted a “tsunami” of young people seeking help.

A group of psychologists working with the University of Bath says it is receiving a growing volume of enquiries from teachers, doctors and therapists unable to cope.

The Climate Psychology Alliance (CPA) told The Daily Telegraph some children complaining of eco-anxiety have even been given psychiatric drugs.

The body is campaigning for anxiety specifically caused by fear for the future of the planet to be recognised as a psychological phenomenon."


Ocasio-Cortez: ‘World will end in 12 years’ if climate change not addressed

by John Bowden - 01/22/19 8:27 AM ET



Bernie Sanders: ‘Major Cities Going Under Water’ in ‘8 or 9 Years’ Due to Climate Change

        Craig Bannister  | November 20, 2019 


By metmike - Dec. 14, 2022, 9:55 p.m.
Like Reply

AOC's climate change documentary bombs at box office despite leftist pandering


By metmike - Dec. 14, 2022, 10:26 p.m.
Like Reply

Their solution to the FAKE climate crisis?

Replace the form of energy that's greening up the planet with beneficial CO2 emissions, which is extremely reliable and abundant     with forms of energy that will WRECK the planet, especially massive industrial wind turbines, the diffuse, intermittent energy source from environmental hell That will kill millions of bats and birds…..including some threatened with extinction, while ruining landscapes and disrupting ecosystems.

Twenty-Five Industrial Wind Energy Deceptions


The cost to switch from fossil fuels to wind, solar and batteries?

431+ trillion!  20 times the GDP. Impossible cost and impossible physics. 


Trying to shut down agriculture:


Killing bats


Fossil fuels are its own battery. A grid scale battery technology has not even been invented that could viably work to replace what our power plants generate today.

Absurdly, they want to ADD 40% more demand to the electricity grid by electrifying all vehicles.........selling it all .by making things up that defy the physical laws of energy. 

If it was possible, the cost would be over 400 trillion in the USA. 20 times the the current GDP. 

Impossible cost to do something which is impossible to begin with........just promises that it will work, while presenting NO viable or realistic evidence that it could ever come close to working.

Based on crony capitalism, political agenda and massive funding provided by governments to  scientists (most climate scientists work for governments) along with the gatekeepers of messaging repeating things that extremely exaggerate  or mislead on the true climate/weather  but support a climate crisis, while burying the massive proof that indisputably debunks it.

And ignoring the real environmental crisis's because those don't pay the financial, power, political, and ratings rewards the can be obtained from pushing a fake climate crisis and that the beneficial gas, CO2 which is only half the optimal level for life is a form of pollution.

metmike is a practicing environmentalist!

Therealenvironmental crisis's/insects dying-dead zones-aquifers drying up-plastics in the ocean-landfills/trash-over consumption of natural resources-REAL pollution in the air/soil/water-WIND TURBINES (metmike is a PRACTICING environmentalist): April 2019


Climate Religion


                Great reality discussion on batteries            


Previous thread with a compilation of 100 threads and 1,000 posts with all the authentic empirical data, evidence and science exposing the FAKE climate crisis as a big fraud.


By metmike - Dec. 15, 2022, 9:12 a.m.
Like Reply

By all authentic scientific standards, we're having a climate OPTIMUM for life, similar to the scientifically defined Holocene climate OPTIMUM 6,000 years ago that was 2 deg. C WARMER than this in the higher latitudes with less Arctic sea ice.

Except now, we have 100 parts per million more beneficial CO2(420 ppm vs 300 ppm) which is causing a GREENER planet than what the earth experienced during the last climate OPTIMUM.

This is the best weather/climate and CO2 level for most life on this planet since humans existed. We rescued the planet from near CO2 starvation.


Of 140 sites across the western Arctic, there is clear evidence for conditions that were warmer than now at 120 sites. At 16 sites for which quantitative estimates have been obtained, local temperatures were on average 1.6±0.8 °C higher during the optimum than now. Northwestern North America reached peak warmth first, from 11,000 to 9,000 years ago, but the Laurentide Ice Sheet still chilled eastern Canada. Northeastern North America experienced peak warming 4,000 years later. Along the Arctic Coastal Plain in Alaska, there are indications of summer temperatures 2–3 °C warmer than now.[9] Research indicates that the Arctic had less sea ice than now.[10]


The planet is greening up and asking for MORE CO2!

The optimal level for plants is more than double this.

all animals eat plants or something else that ate plants.

but it’s true that warmer air holds more moisture and rains have increased, including high end flooding events.

maybe we should go back to having another Ice Age which would minimize the heavy rain problem with a warmer planet(-:

what would happen if we just went back to the climate and CO2 of 100 years ago?

1 deg. C cooler and 100 ppm less CO2?

world food production would,plunge close to 30%. 1 billion people would starve within 3 years and only rich people could afford to eat with prices going up 5 to 10 times the current cost to ration supplies that were far short of demand.

the majority of food production today uses Synthetic fertilizer made using fossil fuels.

take that away, along with bringing back the climate of 1922 and world food production would plunge over 60%.

the consequences would be impossible to imagine.

billions would die of starvation and rich people that managed to afford food would be targets for people dying of starvation.

civilized society would cease to exist.

but they want us to believe that fossil fuels, which have given us most of the current technological advances and our abundant food are evil and beneficial CO2 is pollution.

Silly AOC makes a living brainwashing  people into believing this, even as her personal lifestyle uses up 20 times the amount of fossil fuels that I do.

self serving do as she says to make her more rich and powerful even as she does the complete opposite herself.

but people mostly decide what they want to believe based on politics. If somebody from their political side says something….it must be true.

if it comes from the other side or contradicts there side….it must be a lie.

as forumites here know, I don’t belong to either political side, picking and choosing what to believe in based on science, empirical dat/evidence and critical thinking.

many people today go to their favorite sources that tell them things that they want to believe or to echo chambers with birds of a feather with others that repeat what they think they know to each other and reinforce what they want to believe in.

instead of looking objectively at everything and listening to solid points made by those that represent an opposing view.

extreme divisiveness and people like AOC with their virtue signaling, telling lies about the fake climate crisis and other things to enrich her/their  political power are the real crisis in society today.

I'm targeting this hoax and AOC in this thread.

See threads/posts on Fox in the evening to see how the other side does the same things.